plane is the heavier type but the three I replaced were. BTW, the fus30
tailwrap was 0.032 but just wasn't doubled. There is evidence that the
tail section was upgraded by someone somewhere along the line. It has
several mods that were not present in the original but not the fus89's
or the tailwrap doubler - yet. The damage from last summer's incident
was fixed (except for the floats) by November and I put quite a few
hours on the plane since then.
Garry
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 18:11 -0700, Jesse Jenks wrote:
Garry,
Looking at the pictures from the float smackdown I was wondering if you took
note of the thickness of some of the corner wraps that were damaged or
otherwise replaced? It is pretty evident that the forward cabin section took
the worst beating. The lower right wrap was toast. The bottom rear wraps
look like they came out OK though. Do you know if those were original .020
fus-10s, or upgraded to .025 fus-70s?
Thanks
Jesse
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://www.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
