Not knowing much about engine mounts I thought I would post this for some
responses. Some Lycoming engines such as 0-320B1A use a conical and others
use a dynafocal ? mount. When building our Rebels is one preferred over the
other or does it not make a difference. The mounting attach points on the
firewall would be in the same place regardless.
That being said, does anyone have experience with the B1A version... good
bad other.
Roland
R56
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want this big green box to go away? Well here's how...
Click here for full update
Wildcat! photo archives restored.
Click here for full update
Donors can now disable ads.
Click here for instructions
Add yourself to the user map.
Click here for instructions
Click here for full update
Wildcat! photo archives restored.
Click here for full update
Donors can now disable ads.
Click here for instructions
Add yourself to the user map.
Click here for instructions
Conical vs. Dynafocal
-
kpierson
Conical vs. Dynafocal
As Si stated the the mounts are different, the 0-320B1A requires a Type
2 moter mount, which is 18* where as most dynafocal engines have
a 30* mount face. Chances are that if you go with a B1A you would
have to weld up your own mount. I intend to use a B1A because they are
160 HP and will burn 91 octane. Prewelded 18* dynafocal rings are available
through ACS, or Wicks.
Keith P 318R
On 6/29/2010 5:38 PM, kriening@rogers.com wrote to rebel-builders:
-> Not knowing much about engine mounts I thought I would post this for
some
-> responses. Some Lycoming engines such as 0-320B1A use a conical and
others
-> use a dynafocal ? mount. When building our Rebels is one preferred over
the
-> other or does it not make a difference. The mounting attach points on the
-> firewall would be in the same place regardless.
->
-> That being said, does anyone have experience with the B1A version... good
-> bad other.
->
-> Roland
-> R56
->
->
->
->
->
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2 moter mount, which is 18* where as most dynafocal engines have
a 30* mount face. Chances are that if you go with a B1A you would
have to weld up your own mount. I intend to use a B1A because they are
160 HP and will burn 91 octane. Prewelded 18* dynafocal rings are available
through ACS, or Wicks.
Keith P 318R
On 6/29/2010 5:38 PM, kriening@rogers.com wrote to rebel-builders:
-> Not knowing much about engine mounts I thought I would post this for
some
-> responses. Some Lycoming engines such as 0-320B1A use a conical and
others
-> use a dynafocal ? mount. When building our Rebels is one preferred over
the
-> other or does it not make a difference. The mounting attach points on the
-> firewall would be in the same place regardless.
->
-> That being said, does anyone have experience with the B1A version... good
-> bad other.
->
-> Roland
-> R56
->
->
->
->
->
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
