Do you want this big green box to go away? Well here's how...

Click here for full update

Wildcat! photo archives restored.

Click here for full update

Donors can now disable ads.

Click here for instructions

Add yourself to the user map.

Click here for instructions

[rebel-builders] rotax + floats ( subject line changed to re

Converted from Wildcat! database. (read only)
Locked
Tyler Coleman

[rebel-builders] rotax + floats ( subject line changed to reflect content )

Post by Tyler Coleman » Sun Feb 19, 2012 6:15 pm

Great point, I do love the ability to choose and change my mind if I want.
From: bobp@prosumers.ca
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] rotax + floats ( subject line changed to reflect content )
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:46:16 -0400


Hi Tyler !

That's the great thing about the Rebel - you don't have to decide
on an engine until you are ready for one, and you can always change it !

You'll have a couple of years to shop for an engine while you are
building - and things might change by the time you are ready ...
who knows, maybe even a diesel, or electric !! ;-)

The original 80 hp. Rotax Rebel, on 1500 straight floats, could
get off the water in 6 seconds solo and light, and 34 seconds with
2 big guys and 3/4 tanks, and still climb at 400 fpm. My old Rebel,
with the (much heavier) 100 hp. O-235-C2C, on 1500 amphibs, could
get off in under 17 seconds - if I was solo and very light ....

Flying well with lower power (and much less weight) requires
finesse, but it is very satisfying - especially at the gas pumps !
Ask the guys who are flying Rotax Rebels now about flying through
the Rockies on 100 degree days .... ;-)

Last Ramble to the coast, I put $2,630 worth of 100 LL through
my 150 hp Lycoming O-320 - the 80 hp. Rotax Rebel used $880 worth
of mogas, and the 100 hp. Rotax Rebel still used under $1K.

My <next> Rebel will definitely be a 100 hp. Rotax 912, set up for
1500 amphibs..... :-) Should be fun, very safe, and also meet
the US Sport Pilot requirements - which we might get, someday,
in Canada !

--
......bobp
bobp@prosumers.ca
http://www.amway.ca/BobPatterson
http://bpatterson.qhealthbeauty.com
http://apatterson2.ordermygift.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender
and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other entities or persons.
Any action taken as a result of the contents of this email is totally the
responsibility of the reader.

On March 27, 2010 10:15:38 am Walter Klatt wrote:
Tyler, I am in BC (Langley) and used to run a 150 hp O-320 in my amphib
Rebel. Worked good up to about 3000 ft lakes. But higher than that, you
really extended your take-off runs, especially on a hot day. In fact on a
hot day, glassy water, heavy load, you probably wouldn't get off. And of
course, your climb rate is really down at higher altitudes on hot days.
Could be a real issue if you need to clear trees or a rise coming out of a
high elevation lake.

I now run an O-360 (only 8 pounds more than a 320) in my Rebel, and it made
a huge difference in performance. Also, found that this engine has better
fuel consumption than my 320. That is probably due primarily to having EI
in the new engine.

And for perspective, my old 320 Rebel was no slouch. Near sea level, I
could be off the water in 10 seconds when lightly loaded, and less than 30
seconds with a heavy load. It still out performed any Cessna floatplane.

But if you are talking about flying into small alpine lakes (which I really
enjoy), that is a whole different story.

One of the local guys here running an Elite amphib, is just in the process
of switching out his 180 hp 360 for an O-375 (205 hp). This engine weighs
the same as a 360, but has a stroked crankshaft to get the extra
displacement and hp. If you want to run mogas in this one, you need to
select the lower compression pistons (195 hp).

As for fuel, I use mogas whenever I can. In winter, and on trips, I use
mostly 100LL. Most airports do not sell mogas. Both Superior and ECI engine
manufacturers approve mogas, but recommend 100LL for break-in and
occasional use afterwards.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
Coleman
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 11:16 PM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: RE: [rebel-builders] rotax + floats ( subject line changed to
reflect content )


Thanks Drew,

I was concerned about that as I live in BC and there are a lot of high
altitude lake I'd like to visit. I'm fine with the idea of a lycoming 160hp
but I'm concerned with all the talk I hear of 100LL becoming a soon to be
forgoten commodity. any thoughts? anyone?
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:46:32 -0400
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
From: drewjan@cabletv.on.ca
Subject: [rebel-builders] rotax + floats ( subject line changed to
reflect
content )
At 08:31 PM 25/03/2010 -0700, you wrote: amphibs.

Yes. Maybe. It Depends on your mission. If you're near sea level and it's
not too hot it's probably just fine. What gross weight are you planning?
I swapped out my 125HP lycoming for 160 hp because I felt I had
margional performance at gross weight on a hot day and I'm in southern
Ontario
mostly
600-100'ASL.
Drew

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------



_________________________________________________________________
Live connected with Messenger on your phone
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9712958



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Locked