Pro seal? or is it?

[S & L Aldrich]

FWIW,
I have found that my fast build tanks do not have P/S 890 in them as I
thought. It is CS3204-B2. The spec sheets says that CS3204 is compatible
with 1422, which I assume is the PR1422 that Warren mentioned is Airbus
Specification. He also mentioned that 890 and 1422 are not compatible
unless a primer is used. So if 1422 is compatible with CS3204, is CS3204
non-compatible with 890??
The CS3204 is easier to get, so I am going with it.

Scott
N174SL









-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[Warren Montgomery]

Scott,
Not familiar with CS3204.
These guys don't like there products messed with as they are after exact
chemical properties. Even the hardener is custom blended for each batch.

I got my extra PR1422 direct from the middle east rep. I was lucky and they
were literally in my backyard, well almost. It also came with a ton of
certified paperwork with lots of stamps and signatures as to the batch
properties. I had asked about blending A and B to get something like C but was
told not too.

Bottom line is it's probably not too critical using one over another if it's
ruffed up however if you can stick with the same part number you won't be
creating any possible grief.

Good luck,
Warren

murphy-rebel-d Digest wrote:

From : flynski@peoplepc.com

---------- Digest Message #1 ----------
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 16:42:52 -0600
From: flynski@peoplepc.com
To: murphy-rebel
Subject: Pro seal? or is it?

FWIW,
I have found that my fast build tanks do not have P/S 890 in them as I
thought. It is CS3204-B2. The spec sheets says that CS3204 is compatible
with 1422, which I assume is the PR1422 that Warren mentioned is Airbus
Specification. He also mentioned that 890 and 1422 are not compatible
unless a primer is used. So if 1422 is compatible with CS3204, is CS3204
non-compatible with 890??
The CS3204 is easier to get, so I am going with it.

Scott
N174SL

----------

*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe go to http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/listserv.htm
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[S & L Aldrich]

Hi Warren,
I just thought it was interesting that after all the talk of Pro Seal, MAM
doesn't even use it. I guess it has sort of become the generic term to use
for any 2 part polysulfide polymer sealer.

I was just concerned that if 1422 isn't compatible with 890, then Chemseal
3204 may not be compatible with 890 either.

The CS3204 seems to go by many different names - SealPak, Chemseal,
Flamemaster CS3204, or as Aircraft Spruce says "a pro seal like, product".

CS3204 Specs are AMS-S-8802 formerly Mil-S-8802F

Take care,
Scott





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------