Bruce, FYI the SR has an entirely different set up for the spring gear compared to the Rebel/Elite. The Rebel was an "after thought" bolting on below the carrythrough, while the SR was a "preplanned" assembly with an internal "gear box" similar to the Cessna series, but instead of castings machined/bolt together parts for simplicity.
The problems I have seen with the Rebel spring gear have all been related to the saddle bolts pulling into (or right through) the hollow carrythrough tubes and once that starts to happen the main 3/8" bolt gets twisted off (don't think the 5/16" vs 3/8" saddle bolts changes anything here!). The other bolt failure of a main gear bolt was from hard landings stretching the main bolt, as it is in tension on the Rebel, and just tightening it back up only to break completely a few more high G landings later.
With the SR, the saddle "block" is fairly substantial, with 12 x 5/16" bolts (in shear) holding it to the two carrythrough bulkheads. The gear leg sits up against this block and then a saddle (pretty much identical to the Rebels lower one) holds it in place with two 5/16 bolts in tension. The main gear bolt is 1/2" (7/16 on the 2500) and holds the gear legs top end <down> onto a machined fitting that is bolted to the carrythrough bulkheads with 6 x 3/8" bolts. This means that this main gear bolt area fitting is taking the normal landing load and the bolt is not in tension, but simply holding the leg in place on the fitting (unlike the Rebel where the landing load is trying to pull the nut off the 3/8" main bolt on every landing). Might be a little shear load on the bolt due to the angle the fitting is on, but definitely no tension load on it (in a normal landing).
Now if we get the airplane going sideways (which adds some inward loads) and hit the brake to straighten out (which adds some twisting loads), we now have the forward 5/16 saddle bolt taking the twisting load trying to stretch it or pop the nut off and of course the 1/2" bolt is trying to have the head twisted off at the same time in addition to a shear load from the inward push of the leg (and possibly some tension load as the leg is trying to bend the other way if the tire digs in). Compared to a Cessna, the 5/16 saddle bolts MAY be the weak link here, as a Cessna has a solid casing (that are prone to cracking) that holds the leg from twisting. The main gear bolt is retained in a similar fashion on both and is only susceptible to being sheared off if you get her going sideways with enough inward force to shear the 1/2" bolt. In defense of Murphy, if you get her this far around you're in trouble on any aircraft. Even one of the UTVA's, that the group of us brought into Canada, had the gear cleaned off one side. You can land these things in a full stall landing from 10 feet up, as that is what they are designed to do, but if you want to slide them sideways the (Beaver style nutcracker/rubber block) gear is going to fold up underneath (as only 2 x 3/8" check bolts keep the gear from going the wrong way).
I don't want to put any more "speculation" into what happened to Al's new SR. I know his gut wrenching feelings all too well, as he sits quietly waiting for Darryl and Brian to arrive tomorrow (nice that they are close enough to do so in such an expedient manner!!). Let's allow them to evaluate the <ENTIRE> situation to it's fullest and wait to see what the analysis reveals. We don't need to add any unnecessary "fear" to all the SR builders minds at this point in time, as there are others flying very successfully without this failure (some on very large tires which multiply some of these loads!) wondering what they have gotten into. The dust will clear, the answers will come out, and we can all carry on with our projects. Unfortunately for Al he has some rework to do, after the analysis, but the good thing is that Al's still around to do it!
Regards,
Wayne G. O'Shea
www.irishfield.on.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: Legeorgen@cs.com (
Legeorgen@cs.com)
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com (
murphy-rebel@dcsol.com)
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: Spring gear problems
Al,
I sounds like from your description you had a bolt failure or maybe a torqueing thing. Did the bolt appear to shear or did it tear out the carry thru tube first? MAM stresses re-torqueing the bolts after the first run.
My spring gear is one of the first they shipped in 94 and the saddle bolts and inner bolt are AN6's not the AN-5's MAM ships with the gear now. I don't know when they made the change or if it even makes a difference. I believe it was to make a better fit with the carry thru tubes.
It will be interesting to see what Daryl and Brian have to say after viewing your plane.
Bruce G 357R