Do you want this big green box to go away? Well here's how...

Click here for full update

Wildcat! photo archives restored.

Click here for full update

Donors can now disable ads.

Click here for instructions

Add yourself to the user map.

Click here for instructions

[rebel-builders] header tank

Converted from Wildcat! database. (read only)
Bob Palmer

[rebel-builders] Header Tank

Post by Bob Palmer » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:35 pm

The C185 has a both selection. Of course no one would introduce an empty
tank into the mix, would they?

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 10:03 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
I am not familiar with 185 fuel systems (or many others). But as I
understand it, if you have a fuel pump, engine or electric going, it is the
opposite of gravity feed systems with how you select your tanks on low fuel.

IE, when on low fuel, you want to use only the tank with the most fuel. If
you have the empty one open, too, it can suck air from it instead of fuel
from the good one, and you could end up with a lot of air in your fuel
system.

I thought that certified systems usually don't have a Both in those
situations for that reason, just a Left and Right, and you need to manage
your tanks separately. At least that is how it was in the Cherokee 140 that
I used to fly, a long time ago.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Palmer
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:28 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Walter,

I once had a particularly long flight in moderate turbulence in a Cessna
185. To make a long story short I had the engine quit twenty miles back at
about twelve hundred feet. Fortunately, the engine was restored at about
seven hundred feet. I also heard rumors that air in the lines was strongly
implicated in the crash of another C185.
However, that is not recreational flying because nobody has any fun in
moderate turbulence and nobody has any fun down close to the last thirty
minutes of fuel either. Hope we all just have fun!

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 7:25 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
Just want to mention, too, that this discussion only applies to
gravity feed fuel systems with no engine or electric pump. A pump will
suck through the air. Although you can still have other issues like vapor
lock.
Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Walter Klatt
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 6:22 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: RE: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Yes, a larger fuel line would help with eliminating bubbles. I just
don't want to blow this issue out of proportion, though. It is
important to understand what can happen, but it is not something that
I am concerned about. You just need to know how to properly operate
your aircraft and fuel systems under all circumstances.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Ben Ransom
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:56 PM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Bringing in Walter's advice not to over-complicate, the simpler
version of your idea Ray might be to just be in the habit of always
using up left tank first. (no transfer pump)
From the discussion I've wondered about using larger diameter fuel line.
This wouldn't prevent trapped air problems from pilot error in
changing tanks. But it might prevent the air bubble problem ...and
heck, that way I could consider my fuel lines a small header tank!
-Ben

On 12/5/11 11:59 AM, "ray"<raybot@comcast.net> wrote:
I,m thinking about dual tanks and gravity feed alot lately and
although my system has worked fine with one very notable exception I
do not like starting to worry about fuel stavation while still having
usable fuel in both tanks. I have the glass sight gauges mounted at
an angle but they are tee,d into the supply line.I want to throw out
my idea for discussion. I ,m thinking of using the passenger side
tank as a main tank and the pilot side as a aux tank with an electric
transfer pump.
This is to transfer all usable fuel to one tank. My thinking is this
deepens the fuel, reducing sloshing and is easier to monitor. If I
did a header tank I am thinking of some
1.5
inch diameter aluminum tubing.thickwall with a conical cap with vent
at top.
This would mount vertical in the cabin as high and as long as
practical and be securely mounted and possibly even enclosed in some
reinforced hose for crash/leak protection. This would allow for some
unporting and frothy fuel to settle out. This is slightly more fuel
in the cabin with me but is still a gravity feed system. The aux tank
could still fuction as a main tank by opening the valve. My strategy
right now is maximum fuel at all times and I will fix the tee,d
situation as my next priority. I also am running the four blade warp
in front of a 290 and I like it but have nothing to compare it
to,it pulls hard on takeoff ant top speed is about 110 mph Ray
----- Original Message -----
From:<paul.lennemann@dcsol.com>
To:<rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username "rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username "rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username "rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Wayne G. O'Shea

[rebel-builders] Header Tank

Post by Wayne G. O'Shea » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:35 pm

Easy to do.. I left my C182 at the FBO for an annual 15 years or so
ago....and it had been left parked with the right wing down in a low
spot.... with the tanks on both.

I picked up the airplane and took off from Midland.. with tanks still on
both (like you're told to) for the quick 5 minute flight home. When turning
base/final for our home field.. RIGHT HAND CIRCUIT.. the engine quit now
that it was trying to feed off the empty left tank! Good thing I keep my
circuits tight !! Engine refired as I was flaring to land and of course I'd
left the throttle firewalled hoping it would catch somewhere in the glide...
that lead to some more excitment!! LOL

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Palmer" <rtpalmer@shaw.ca>
To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

The C185 has a both selection. Of course no one would introduce an empty
tank into the mix, would they?

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 10:03 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
I am not familiar with 185 fuel systems (or many others). But as I
understand it, if you have a fuel pump, engine or electric going, it is
the
opposite of gravity feed systems with how you select your tanks on low
fuel.

IE, when on low fuel, you want to use only the tank with the most fuel.
If
you have the empty one open, too, it can suck air from it instead of fuel
from the good one, and you could end up with a lot of air in your fuel
system.

I thought that certified systems usually don't have a Both in those
situations for that reason, just a Left and Right, and you need to manage
your tanks separately. At least that is how it was in the Cherokee 140
that
I used to fly, a long time ago.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Palmer
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:28 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Walter,

I once had a particularly long flight in moderate turbulence in a Cessna
185. To make a long story short I had the engine quit twenty miles back
at
about twelve hundred feet. Fortunately, the engine was restored at about
seven hundred feet. I also heard rumors that air in the lines was
strongly
implicated in the crash of another C185.
However, that is not recreational flying because nobody has any fun in
moderate turbulence and nobody has any fun down close to the last thirty
minutes of fuel either. Hope we all just have fun!

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 7:25 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
Just want to mention, too, that this discussion only applies to
gravity feed fuel systems with no engine or electric pump. A pump will
suck through the air. Although you can still have other issues like
vapor
lock.
Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Walter Klatt
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 6:22 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: RE: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Yes, a larger fuel line would help with eliminating bubbles. I just
don't want to blow this issue out of proportion, though. It is
important to understand what can happen, but it is not something that
I am concerned about. You just need to know how to properly operate
your aircraft and fuel systems under all circumstances.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Ben Ransom
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:56 PM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Bringing in Walter's advice not to over-complicate, the simpler
version of your idea Ray might be to just be in the habit of always
using up left tank first. (no transfer pump)
This wouldn't prevent trapped air problems from pilot error in
changing tanks. But it might prevent the air bubble problem ...and
heck, that way I could consider my fuel lines a small header tank!
-Ben

On 12/5/11 11:59 AM, "ray"<raybot@comcast.net> wrote:
transfer pump.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Walter Klatt

[rebel-builders] Header Tank

Post by Walter Klatt » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:35 pm

I guess with high wings, you would still get gravity feed helping, so less
critical if you use Both with a fuel pump. But on a low wing, I could see
that as more of a problem with one tank empty.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Palmer
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 10:12 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

The C185 has a both selection. Of course no one would introduce an empty
tank into the mix, would they?

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 10:03 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
I am not familiar with 185 fuel systems (or many others). But as I
understand it, if you have a fuel pump, engine or electric going, it
is the opposite of gravity feed systems with how you select your tanks on
low fuel.
IE, when on low fuel, you want to use only the tank with the most
fuel. If you have the empty one open, too, it can suck air from it
instead of fuel from the good one, and you could end up with a lot of
air in your fuel system.

I thought that certified systems usually don't have a Both in those
situations for that reason, just a Left and Right, and you need to
manage your tanks separately. At least that is how it was in the
Cherokee 140 that I used to fly, a long time ago.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Bob Palmer
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:28 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Walter,

I once had a particularly long flight in moderate turbulence in a
Cessna 185. To make a long story short I had the engine quit twenty
miles back at about twelve hundred feet. Fortunately, the engine was
restored at about seven hundred feet. I also heard rumors that air in
the lines was strongly implicated in the crash of another C185.
However, that is not recreational flying because nobody has any fun in
moderate turbulence and nobody has any fun down close to the last
thirty minutes of fuel either. Hope we all just have fun!

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 7:25 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
Just want to mention, too, that this discussion only applies to
gravity feed fuel systems with no engine or electric pump. A pump
will suck through the air. Although you can still have other issues
like vapor
lock.
Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Walter Klatt
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 6:22 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: RE: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Yes, a larger fuel line would help with eliminating bubbles. I just
don't want to blow this issue out of proportion, though. It is
important to understand what can happen, but it is not something that
I am concerned about. You just need to know how to properly operate
your aircraft and fuel systems under all circumstances.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Ben Ransom
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:56 PM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Bringing in Walter's advice not to over-complicate, the simpler
version of your idea Ray might be to just be in the habit of always
using up left tank first. (no transfer pump)
From the discussion I've wondered about using larger diameter fuel
line.
This wouldn't prevent trapped air problems from pilot error in
changing tanks. But it might prevent the air bubble problem ...and
heck, that way I could consider my fuel lines a small header tank!
-Ben

On 12/5/11 11:59 AM, "ray"<raybot@comcast.net> wrote:
I,m thinking about dual tanks and gravity feed alot lately and
although my system has worked fine with one very notable exception I
do not like starting to worry about fuel stavation while still
having usable fuel in both tanks. I have the glass sight gauges
mounted at an angle but they are tee,d into the supply line.I want
to throw out my idea for discussion. I ,m thinking of using the
passenger side tank as a main tank and the pilot side as a aux tank
with an electric
transfer pump.
This is to transfer all usable fuel to one tank. My thinking is this
deepens the fuel, reducing sloshing and is easier to monitor. If I
did a header tank I am thinking of some
1.5
inch diameter aluminum tubing.thickwall with a conical cap with vent
at top.
This would mount vertical in the cabin as high and as long as
practical and be securely mounted and possibly even enclosed in some
reinforced hose for crash/leak protection. This would allow for some
unporting and frothy fuel to settle out. This is slightly more fuel
in the cabin with me but is still a gravity feed system. The aux
tank could still fuction as a main tank by opening the valve. My
strategy right now is maximum fuel at all times and I will fix the
tee,d situation as my next priority. I also am running the four
blade warp in front of a 290 and I like it but have nothing to compare
it
to,it pulls hard on takeoff ant top speed is about 110 mph Ray
----- Original Message -----
From:<paul.lennemann@dcsol.com>
To:<rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username "rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username "rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Bob Palmer

[rebel-builders] Header Tank

Post by Bob Palmer » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:35 pm

BTW, I always made it a practice to select one tank when parked. On skis
(or wheels on a slope) with 'both' select and near full tanks can allow
one tank to feed the other and then go overboard on Cessnas because the
vent is on the outboard side of the tank. If you are out in the middle
of nowhere that can be a bit awkward.

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 12:51 PM, Walter Klatt wrote:
I guess with high wings, you would still get gravity feed helping, so less
critical if you use Both with a fuel pump. But on a low wing, I could see
that as more of a problem with one tank empty.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Palmer
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 10:12 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

The C185 has a both selection. Of course no one would introduce an empty
tank into the mix, would they?

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 10:03 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
I am not familiar with 185 fuel systems (or many others). But as I
understand it, if you have a fuel pump, engine or electric going, it
is the opposite of gravity feed systems with how you select your tanks on
low fuel.
IE, when on low fuel, you want to use only the tank with the most
fuel. If you have the empty one open, too, it can suck air from it
instead of fuel from the good one, and you could end up with a lot of
air in your fuel system.

I thought that certified systems usually don't have a Both in those
situations for that reason, just a Left and Right, and you need to
manage your tanks separately. At least that is how it was in the
Cherokee 140 that I used to fly, a long time ago.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Bob Palmer
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:28 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Walter,

I once had a particularly long flight in moderate turbulence in a
Cessna 185. To make a long story short I had the engine quit twenty
miles back at about twelve hundred feet. Fortunately, the engine was
restored at about seven hundred feet. I also heard rumors that air in
the lines was strongly implicated in the crash of another C185.
However, that is not recreational flying because nobody has any fun in
moderate turbulence and nobody has any fun down close to the last
thirty minutes of fuel either. Hope we all just have fun!

Bob.

On 12/9/2011 7:25 AM, Walter Klatt wrote:
Just want to mention, too, that this discussion only applies to
gravity feed fuel systems with no engine or electric pump. A pump
will suck through the air. Although you can still have other issues
like vapor
lock.
Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Walter Klatt
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 6:22 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: RE: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Yes, a larger fuel line would help with eliminating bubbles. I just
don't want to blow this issue out of proportion, though. It is
important to understand what can happen, but it is not something that
I am concerned about. You just need to know how to properly operate
your aircraft and fuel systems under all circumstances.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of
Ben Ransom
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:56 PM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Bringing in Walter's advice not to over-complicate, the simpler
version of your idea Ray might be to just be in the habit of always
using up left tank first. (no transfer pump)
line.
This wouldn't prevent trapped air problems from pilot error in
changing tanks. But it might prevent the air bubble problem ...and
heck, that way I could consider my fuel lines a small header tank!
-Ben

On 12/5/11 11:59 AM, "ray"<raybot@comcast.net> wrote:
transfer pump.
it
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username
"rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username "rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login username "rebel"
password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

ray

[rebel-builders] Header Tank

Post by ray » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:35 pm

I agree with the over complication too and I,m not sure what exactly to do
that is all positive and no negative. The single main tank with the fuel
transfer pump is an answer to one scenerio that goes kinda like this. You
are lower on fuel than you should be and its rougher than you like and the
anxious meter is climbing and you have 3 or 4 galons on each side with both
valves open.You close one and transfer fuel to the main tank which now holds
6 to 8 gallons and feeds through a 'fat' fuel line.This sounds mostly
positive because it does not intefere with the stock setup most or all of
the time if you leave it alone. One of the things I want to do in 2012 is
run one tank dry in the air flying and then land and drain and refill the
tank to see the usable. I used to fear that scenerio but have gone through
a midair shutdown and restart and will do it again to find out what is
really going on with this plane,will probably hold off on any mods until I
do this exercise above the airport. I may just leave well enough
alone,especially if the tests show good results. The collective wisdom and
experience here is highly regarded. The ability of this system to feed a 360
at a steep full power climb is also a big endorsment of the design as is.
Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Ransom" <bransom@ucdavis.edu>
To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

Bringing in Walter's advice not to over-complicate, the simpler version of
your idea Ray might be to just be in the habit of always using up left
tank first. (no transfer pump)

From the discussion I've wondered about using larger diameter fuel line.
This wouldn't prevent trapped air problems from pilot error in changing
tanks. But it might prevent the air bubble problem ...and heck, that way I
could consider my fuel lines a small header tank!
-Ben

On 12/5/11 11:59 AM, "ray" <raybot@comcast.net> wrote:
I,m thinking about dual tanks and gravity feed alot lately and although
my
system has worked fine with one very notable exception I do not like
starting to worry about fuel stavation while still having usable fuel in
both tanks. I have the glass sight gauges mounted at an angle but they
are
tee,d into the supply line.I want to throw out my idea for discussion. I
,m
thinking of using the passenger side tank as a main tank and the pilot
side
as a aux tank with an electric transfer pump. This is to transfer all
usable
fuel to one tank. My thinking is this deepens the fuel, reducing sloshing
and is easier to monitor. If I did a header tank I am thinking of some
1.5
inch diameter aluminum tubing.thickwall with a conical cap with vent at
top.
This would mount vertical in the cabin as high and as long as practical
and
be securely mounted and possibly even enclosed in some reinforced hose
for
crash/leak protection. This would allow for some unporting and frothy
fuel
to settle out. This is slightly more fuel in the cabin with me but is
still
a gravity feed system. The aux tank could still fuction as a main tank by
opening the valve. My strategy right now is maximum fuel at all times and
I
will fix the tee,d situation as my next priority. I also am running the
four
blade warp in front of a 290 and I like it but have nothing to compare it
to,it pulls hard on takeoff ant top speed is about 110 mph Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: <paul.lennemann@dcsol.com>
To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Header Tank

On 12/4/2011 12:03 PM, rtpalmer@shaw.ca wrote to rebel-builders:

Thanks Bob, makes more sense to me now.

Paul



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------







=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.26, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18830)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------







=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.26, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18870)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


gleeso1

[rebel-builders] Header Tank

Post by gleeso1 » Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:35 pm

Unusable fuel, Re a simple solution, set the fuse at straight and
level, ( or whatever attitude you fly at,) drain all the fuel from the
gascolator,/carb fitting,
and then from the wing tank drains. Worked OK with my PA 22-150.
Actually only got 2 liters, while the placards read full 68 L, usable 64.
(also saves the " I hope it restarts thought and the change of
underwear) if you run one tank until the engine stops and is slow to
restart.
FWIW
Gleeso, Rebel 804 Down Under.





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


Locked