Do you want this big green box to go away? Well here's how...

Click here for full update

Wildcat! photo archives restored.

Click here for full update

Donors can now disable ads.

Click here for instructions

Add yourself to the user map.

Click here for instructions

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Converted from Wildcat! database. (read only)
Locked
Ron Shannon

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Ron Shannon » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Jason,

When this came up before, advice here on the list confirmed that at neutral
the trailing edge of the flaperon is actually a little above cabin top --
and that's the way 254R was built.

Ron
http://n254mr.com



On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Rebecca Brownell <
brownell@cottagecountry.net> wrote:
Hello all
I'm mounting the fairing boxes at the wing root and was wondering if
someone could tell me if there is a proper way to measure where the
exact neutral position is for the ailerons.I'm assuming that if the
top of the aileron is flush with the top of the cabin that would be
neutral but I could measure it another way or two that would put it up
or down a couple degrees.Flush with the top of the cabin seems to make
the most sense but some confirmation would be nice.
thanks in advance
Jason
817R


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Drew Dalgleish

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Drew Dalgleish » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

At 11:30 PM 29/01/2009 -0500, you wrote:
Hello all
I'm mounting the fairing boxes at the wing root and was wondering if
someone could tell me if there is a proper way to measure where the
exact neutral position is for the ailerons.I'm assuming that if the
top of the aileron is flush with the top of the cabin that would be
neutral but I could measure it another way or two that would put it up
or down a couple degrees.Flush with the top of the cabin seems to make
the most sense but some confirmation would be nice.
thanks in advance
Jason
817R
I used the top of the cabin and it matches at the wing tips so I guess
that's neutral.
Drew



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Jeff Micheal

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Jeff Micheal » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Hi Jason,

Attach aileron/flap (flaperon) to wing, position the bottom of Aileron LE
skin in line with the bottom of wing skin -- this is neutral position, also
noting that the trailing edge of the aileron/flap will be 5 deg reflex
(built in design).


On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Rebecca Brownell <
brownell@cottagecountry.net> wrote:
Hello all
I'm mounting the fairing boxes at the wing root and was wondering if
someone could tell me if there is a proper way to measure where the
exact neutral position is for the ailerons.I'm assuming that if the
top of the aileron is flush with the top of the cabin that would be
neutral but I could measure it another way or two that would put it up
or down a couple degrees.Flush with the top of the cabin seems to make
the most sense but some confirmation would be nice.
thanks in advance
Jason
817R



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Rebecca Brownell

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Rebecca Brownell » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Great jeff thanks.Is one supposed to build the fairing boxes and the
wing tip to line up with the aileron when in neutral position?that
would make the fairing box come up at a bit of an angle from the cabin
roof.not a problem if that's the way its supposed to be.appreciate the
input.
Jason
On 30-Jan-09, at 11:34 AM, Jeff Micheal wrote:
Hi Jason,

Attach aileron/flap (flaperon) to wing, position the bottom of
Aileron LE
skin in line with the bottom of wing skin -- this is neutral
position, also
noting that the trailing edge of the aileron/flap will be 5 deg reflex
(built in design).


On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Rebecca Brownell <
brownell@cottagecountry.net> wrote:
Hello all
I'm mounting the fairing boxes at the wing root and was wondering if
someone could tell me if there is a proper way to measure where the
exact neutral position is for the ailerons.I'm assuming that if the
top of the aileron is flush with the top of the cabin that would be
neutral but I could measure it another way or two that would put it
up
or down a couple degrees.Flush with the top of the cabin seems to
make
the most sense but some confirmation would be nice.
thanks in advance
Jason
817R



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Wayne G. O'Shea

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Wayne G. O'Shea » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Do yourself a favour Jason, if you want it to look right..... flush rivet
the cabin roof to the angles that are inside that area so the structure is
sound... then carry on with the build. When you have your wings and
flaperons mounted to the aircraft.. then build and position your fairing
boxes and drill them to the cabin roof interpitched between the existing
counter sunk rivets.

Wayne

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rebecca Brownell" <brownell@cottagecountry.net>
To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Great jeff thanks.Is one supposed to build the fairing boxes and the
wing tip to line up with the aileron when in neutral position?that
would make the fairing box come up at a bit of an angle from the cabin
roof.not a problem if that's the way its supposed to be.appreciate the
input.
Jason
On 30-Jan-09, at 11:34 AM, Jeff Micheal wrote:
Hi Jason,

Attach aileron/flap (flaperon) to wing, position the bottom of
Aileron LE
skin in line with the bottom of wing skin -- this is neutral
position, also
noting that the trailing edge of the aileron/flap will be 5 deg reflex
(built in design).


On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Rebecca Brownell <
brownell@cottagecountry.net> wrote:
Hello all
I'm mounting the fairing boxes at the wing root and was wondering if
someone could tell me if there is a proper way to measure where the
exact neutral position is for the ailerons.I'm assuming that if the
top of the aileron is flush with the top of the cabin that would be
neutral but I could measure it another way or two that would put it
up
or down a couple degrees.Flush with the top of the cabin seems to
make
the most sense but some confirmation would be nice.
thanks in advance
Jason
817R



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


Ron Shannon

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Ron Shannon » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

[VERBOSITY ALERT: Read at your own risk of boredom, etc.]

Here's how I analyzed this "neutral" issue for purposes of setting the mixer
arm travel. Reasonable minds may differ, but as discussed below, in the end
it may be more a question of semantics than anything else.

When setting the mixer arm travel, Ch. 20, p. 28, calls for alignment of the
aileron trailing edge 5-1/4" up from neutral. However, Ch. 20 doesn't
clearly define neutral, except to the extent it is shown and specifically
labeled in Fig. 20.6.2. If this isn't immediately apparent to your eye, put
a straight edge on that diagram and you'll see the aileron in "neutral"
position is quite clearly angled up a bit from the line across the bottom of
the wing. The same slight up angling is shown in Fig. 10.12.3. As far as I
can tell, that's as close as the documentation comes to definitively
defining "neutral". However, FWIW, as discussed below, the documentation
does clearly show a "0 deg." line.

The method of defining aileron neutral, adopted by some here, is to make a
straight line across the bottom of the wing and the bottom of the aileron.
This results in the aileron trailing edge lining up more or less with the
fairing and cabin top at "neutral". However, if "0 deg." is the same as
"neutral", it's not possible to use the bottom lines _and_ pass through the
aileron hinge as shown in the figures cited above where the "0 deg." line is
clearly defined, because the hinge is not on that line.

Ch. 10.12, pp 1-2, Fig. 10.12.2, shows the 0 deg. position drawn from the
center of the aileron hinge pivot to the trailing edge. The questions are 1)
is this "0 deg." line the same as "neutral" -- most would think so -- and 2)
if so, where is the forward extension of that line? What is clear is that
the "0 deg." line cannot be congruent with a line along the bottom of the
wing because the hinge is well above that line. Although the documentation
is less than crystal clear on this point, the 0 deg. line (from aileron
hinge to aileron trailing edge) when the aileron bottom is angled up
slightly, aligns perfectly (?) with a line from the hinge to the wing
leading edge, i.e., a line from the wing leading edge, through the aileron
hinge to the aileron trailing edge -- which is also geometrically the
maximum chord line, though the difference in chord length between these
methods is certainly insignificant. Adopting the "0 deg." line as "neutral"
places the aileron trailing edge about 1/2" above cabin roof and fairing at
"neutral."

What this boils down to is that if you think the 0 deg. line shown in Fig.
10.12.3 is the same as the manual's "neutral", you may end up with the
"neutral" aileron trailing edge roughly 1/2" above the cabin top. On the
other hand, if you think the manual's "neutral" must be "aerodynamic
neutral" and that "aerodynamic neutral" _must_ be with the bottom line of
the aileron in line with the bottom of the wing (not necessarily true), then
"neutral" ends up with aileron trailing edge at fairing and cabin top.

"Neutral" is not mentioned in the fairings chapter. "Neutral" is mentioned
in the wing tip chapter. I haven't done my wing tips yet, but I suspect
they're sufficiently maneuverable to accommodate the small difference
between either method discussed here -- but there's no need to quibble over
that. There's no question that aesthetically, it looks best to have the
tips, ailerons, fairings and cabin all lined up together when parked on the
ramp. However the "0 deg."method can be used for setting mixer arm neutral,
and wing tips still can be set at "aesthetic neutral" without affecting any
flying qualities, per se, because....

As a practical matter, I think the only real significance of the "neutral"
definition for builders is that it's used to mark and set the mixer arm,
before measuring and installing the push-pull tubes, etc. Where you set
"neutral" thus affects what absolute top and bottom travel you will have for
flaperon movement at the mixer arm, regardless of how you label the
positions. Except for that, it doesn't really matter which method you use to
define aileron neutral because for aesthetics, you can line things up
regardless.

FWIW, I used the "0 deg. line" method which more closely approximates
Figures 10.12.3 and 20.6.2 and came out with _possible_ available travel of
about 10 deg. up, and about 20 deg. down -- which is the outside range of
what I would ever want -- so it worked great for me. I think that regardless
of whether "neutral" in the manual means "aerodynamic neutral" or not, and
regardless of where that is -- the manual at least means "travel neutral",
for purposes of setting upper and lower limits of travel.

I believe it was Bob P. who confirmed that the manual's "neutral" has
aileron trailing edge slightly above cabin roof. If not, he can and no doubt
will defend himself. <g>

Your mileage may vary, and maybe it should! :-)

Ron
http://n254mr.com


On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Rebecca Brownell <
brownell@cottagecountry.net> wrote:
Great jeff thanks.Is one supposed to build the fairing boxes and the
wing tip to line up with the aileron when in neutral position?that
would make the fairing box come up at a bit of an angle from the cabin
roof.not a problem if that's the way its supposed to be.appreciate the
input.
Jason


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Walter Klatt

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Walter Klatt » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

I built my Rebel a long time ago, but still remember that after flying it, I
wished I would have lined up my fairing box and wing tips with the reflex
position since that is where the flaperons spend most of their time. My
assumption is that you would save a bit of drag in reflex cruise then. Just
remember, though, that due to flexing, your inflight reflex position is not
the same as on the ground, just as is the case with the flaperon position.

If you want it to look good on the ground, you can leave them there, too.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Ron
Shannon
Sent: January 30, 2009 2:43 PM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

[VERBOSITY ALERT: Read at your own risk of boredom, etc.]

Here's how I analyzed this "neutral" issue for purposes of setting the mixer
arm travel. Reasonable minds may differ, but as discussed below, in the end
it may be more a question of semantics than anything else.

When setting the mixer arm travel, Ch. 20, p. 28, calls for alignment of the
aileron trailing edge 5-1/4" up from neutral. However, Ch. 20 doesn't
clearly define neutral, except to the extent it is shown and specifically
labeled in Fig. 20.6.2. If this isn't immediately apparent to your eye, put
a straight edge on that diagram and you'll see the aileron in "neutral"
position is quite clearly angled up a bit from the line across the bottom of
the wing. The same slight up angling is shown in Fig. 10.12.3. As far as I
can tell, that's as close as the documentation comes to definitively
defining "neutral". However, FWIW, as discussed below, the documentation
does clearly show a "0 deg." line.

The method of defining aileron neutral, adopted by some here, is to make a
straight line across the bottom of the wing and the bottom of the aileron.
This results in the aileron trailing edge lining up more or less with the
fairing and cabin top at "neutral". However, if "0 deg." is the same as
"neutral", it's not possible to use the bottom lines _and_ pass through the
aileron hinge as shown in the figures cited above where the "0 deg." line is
clearly defined, because the hinge is not on that line.

Ch. 10.12, pp 1-2, Fig. 10.12.2, shows the 0 deg. position drawn from the
center of the aileron hinge pivot to the trailing edge. The questions are 1)
is this "0 deg." line the same as "neutral" -- most would think so -- and 2)
if so, where is the forward extension of that line? What is clear is that
the "0 deg." line cannot be congruent with a line along the bottom of the
wing because the hinge is well above that line. Although the documentation
is less than crystal clear on this point, the 0 deg. line (from aileron
hinge to aileron trailing edge) when the aileron bottom is angled up
slightly, aligns perfectly (?) with a line from the hinge to the wing
leading edge, i.e., a line from the wing leading edge, through the aileron
hinge to the aileron trailing edge -- which is also geometrically the
maximum chord line, though the difference in chord length between these
methods is certainly insignificant. Adopting the "0 deg." line as "neutral"
places the aileron trailing edge about 1/2" above cabin roof and fairing at
"neutral."

What this boils down to is that if you think the 0 deg. line shown in Fig.
10.12.3 is the same as the manual's "neutral", you may end up with the
"neutral" aileron trailing edge roughly 1/2" above the cabin top. On the
other hand, if you think the manual's "neutral" must be "aerodynamic
neutral" and that "aerodynamic neutral" _must_ be with the bottom line of
the aileron in line with the bottom of the wing (not necessarily true), then
"neutral" ends up with aileron trailing edge at fairing and cabin top.

"Neutral" is not mentioned in the fairings chapter. "Neutral" is mentioned
in the wing tip chapter. I haven't done my wing tips yet, but I suspect
they're sufficiently maneuverable to accommodate the small difference
between either method discussed here -- but there's no need to quibble over
that. There's no question that aesthetically, it looks best to have the
tips, ailerons, fairings and cabin all lined up together when parked on the
ramp. However the "0 deg."method can be used for setting mixer arm neutral,
and wing tips still can be set at "aesthetic neutral" without affecting any
flying qualities, per se, because....

As a practical matter, I think the only real significance of the "neutral"
definition for builders is that it's used to mark and set the mixer arm,
before measuring and installing the push-pull tubes, etc. Where you set
"neutral" thus affects what absolute top and bottom travel you will have for
flaperon movement at the mixer arm, regardless of how you label the
positions. Except for that, it doesn't really matter which method you use to
define aileron neutral because for aesthetics, you can line things up
regardless.

FWIW, I used the "0 deg. line" method which more closely approximates
Figures 10.12.3 and 20.6.2 and came out with _possible_ available travel of
about 10 deg. up, and about 20 deg. down -- which is the outside range of
what I would ever want -- so it worked great for me. I think that regardless
of whether "neutral" in the manual means "aerodynamic neutral" or not, and
regardless of where that is -- the manual at least means "travel neutral",
for purposes of setting upper and lower limits of travel.

I believe it was Bob P. who confirmed that the manual's "neutral" has
aileron trailing edge slightly above cabin roof. If not, he can and no doubt
will defend himself. <g>

Your mileage may vary, and maybe it should! :-)

Ron
http://n254mr.com


On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Rebecca Brownell <
brownell@cottagecountry.net> wrote:
Great jeff thanks.Is one supposed to build the fairing boxes and the
wing tip to line up with the aileron when in neutral position?that
would make the fairing box come up at a bit of an angle from the cabin
roof.not a problem if that's the way its supposed to be.appreciate the
input.
Jason


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Ken

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Ken » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

With one notch of reflex my flaperons sag enough to actually sit neutral
when parked but can't say I've ever noticed any aesthetics from this on
any Rebel. I never use two notches of reflex probably due to a
combination of my low power cruise and the drooped STOL leading edge
cuff. At gross weight and much of the time I don't use any so there is
at least one Rebel (maybe only one) for which reflex is not really relevant.

Suspect you are right about more drag clean up by fairing the wing root
than the wingtip. Some Cessna's have a nice fiberglass upswept fuselage
to flap fairing.

Ken

Walter Klatt wrote:
I built my Rebel a long time ago, but still remember that after flying it, I
wished I would have lined up my fairing box and wing tips with the reflex
position since that is where the flaperons spend most of their time. My
assumption is that you would save a bit of drag in reflex cruise then. Just
remember, though, that due to flexing, your inflight reflex position is not
the same as on the ground, just as is the case with the flaperon position.

If you want it to look good on the ground, you can leave them there, too.

Walter

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Walter Klatt

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Walter Klatt » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

I definitely get at least a 5 mph increase in speed with mine. Conversely, I
lose .5 gph to maintain the same speed.

But what is really neutral, as some people here have asked. My reflex (in
flight) might be the same as Ken's neutral. The only true measurement is
relative to the wing, not the cabin roof. In my case, the fairings boxes
actually droop down a bit towards my flaperons in neutral, so that could
explain somewhat my extra speed in reflex.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: January 31, 2009 5:20 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

With one notch of reflex my flaperons sag enough to actually sit neutral
when parked but can't say I've ever noticed any aesthetics from this on
any Rebel. I never use two notches of reflex probably due to a
combination of my low power cruise and the drooped STOL leading edge
cuff. At gross weight and much of the time I don't use any so there is
at least one Rebel (maybe only one) for which reflex is not really relevant.

Suspect you are right about more drag clean up by fairing the wing root
than the wingtip. Some Cessna's have a nice fiberglass upswept fuselage
to flap fairing.

Ken

Walter Klatt wrote:
I built my Rebel a long time ago, but still remember that after flying it,
I
wished I would have lined up my fairing box and wing tips with the reflex
position since that is where the flaperons spend most of their time. My
assumption is that you would save a bit of drag in reflex cruise then.
Just
remember, though, that due to flexing, your inflight reflex position is
not
the same as on the ground, just as is the case with the flaperon position.

If you want it to look good on the ground, you can leave them there, too.

Walter

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------







-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Jeff Micheal

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Jeff Micheal » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Aileron/flap neutral position....... the only two components necessary to
set this is wing and aileron/flap (flapperon). Having the flapperon system
lining up with the fairing box (depending where you position it) is all
cosmetics to have it look good sitting on the ground.

But the original question was....... where is neutral position? (as
designed).


On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Walter Klatt <Walter.Klatt@shaw.ca> wrote:
I definitely get at least a 5 mph increase in speed with mine. Conversely,
I
lose .5 gph to maintain the same speed.

But what is really neutral, as some people here have asked. My reflex (in
flight) might be the same as Ken's neutral. The only true measurement is
relative to the wing, not the cabin roof. In my case, the fairings boxes
actually droop down a bit towards my flaperons in neutral, so that could
explain somewhat my extra speed in reflex.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: January 31, 2009 5:20 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

With one notch of reflex my flaperons sag enough to actually sit neutral
when parked but can't say I've ever noticed any aesthetics from this on
any Rebel. I never use two notches of reflex probably due to a
combination of my low power cruise and the drooped STOL leading edge
cuff. At gross weight and much of the time I don't use any so there is
at least one Rebel (maybe only one) for which reflex is not really
relevant.

Suspect you are right about more drag clean up by fairing the wing root
than the wingtip. Some Cessna's have a nice fiberglass upswept fuselage
to flap fairing.

Ken

Walter Klatt wrote:
I built my Rebel a long time ago, but still remember that after flying
it,
I
wished I would have lined up my fairing box and wing tips with the reflex
position since that is where the flaperons spend most of their time. My
assumption is that you would save a bit of drag in reflex cruise then.
Just
remember, though, that due to flexing, your inflight reflex position is
not
the same as on the ground, just as is the case with the flaperon
position.
If you want it to look good on the ground, you can leave them there, too.

Walter

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------







-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Walter Klatt

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Walter Klatt » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

It's been so long, so can't remember exactly how I did mine, or what the
manual said. But can't you extrapolate where the trailing edge of the chord
should be based on the wing contour, using long straight edges, bottom and
top? In the end, it doesn't matter that much as you just adjust your cable
length and or flap lever notches to make it where you want. But what does
matter is how you position your wing tips and the cabin side fairing. At the
very least they should be the same. Like I said, if I was doing it today, I
would figure out the ideal reflex position, and then set them there.

The only time I fly in neutral is at 80 mph (base leg in the
circuit/pattern, and climb). Below that I go into flap positions, and above
that to reflex.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Micheal
Sent: January 31, 2009 9:34 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Aileron/flap neutral position....... the only two components necessary to
set this is wing and aileron/flap (flapperon). Having the flapperon system
lining up with the fairing box (depending where you position it) is all
cosmetics to have it look good sitting on the ground.

But the original question was....... where is neutral position? (as
designed).


On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Walter Klatt <Walter.Klatt@shaw.ca> wrote:
I definitely get at least a 5 mph increase in speed with mine. Conversely,
I
lose .5 gph to maintain the same speed.

But what is really neutral, as some people here have asked. My reflex (in
flight) might be the same as Ken's neutral. The only true measurement is
relative to the wing, not the cabin roof. In my case, the fairings boxes
actually droop down a bit towards my flaperons in neutral, so that could
explain somewhat my extra speed in reflex.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: January 31, 2009 5:20 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

With one notch of reflex my flaperons sag enough to actually sit neutral
when parked but can't say I've ever noticed any aesthetics from this on
any Rebel. I never use two notches of reflex probably due to a
combination of my low power cruise and the drooped STOL leading edge
cuff. At gross weight and much of the time I don't use any so there is
at least one Rebel (maybe only one) for which reflex is not really
relevant.

Suspect you are right about more drag clean up by fairing the wing root
than the wingtip. Some Cessna's have a nice fiberglass upswept fuselage
to flap fairing.

Ken

Walter Klatt wrote:
I built my Rebel a long time ago, but still remember that after flying
it,
I
wished I would have lined up my fairing box and wing tips with the
reflex
position since that is where the flaperons spend most of their time. My
assumption is that you would save a bit of drag in reflex cruise then.
Just
remember, though, that due to flexing, your inflight reflex position is
not
the same as on the ground, just as is the case with the flaperon
position.
If you want it to look good on the ground, you can leave them there,
too.
Walter

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------







-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin & Nancy Mayville

[rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Post by Kevin & Nancy Mayville » Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:12 pm

Just wondering how many guys have switched from flaperons to flaps ? My
flaps are motorized.

Kevin
Rebel 492R
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walter Klatt" <Walter.Klatt@shaw.ca>
To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:40 PM
Subject: RE: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

It's been so long, so can't remember exactly how I did mine, or what the
manual said. But can't you extrapolate where the trailing edge of the
chord
should be based on the wing contour, using long straight edges, bottom and
top? In the end, it doesn't matter that much as you just adjust your cable
length and or flap lever notches to make it where you want. But what does
matter is how you position your wing tips and the cabin side fairing. At
the
very least they should be the same. Like I said, if I was doing it today,
I
would figure out the ideal reflex position, and then set them there.

The only time I fly in neutral is at 80 mph (base leg in the
circuit/pattern, and climb). Below that I go into flap positions, and
above
that to reflex.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Micheal
Sent: January 31, 2009 9:34 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

Aileron/flap neutral position....... the only two components necessary to
set this is wing and aileron/flap (flapperon). Having the flapperon
system
lining up with the fairing box (depending where you position it) is all
cosmetics to have it look good sitting on the ground.

But the original question was....... where is neutral position? (as
designed).


On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Walter Klatt <Walter.Klatt@shaw.ca>
wrote:
I definitely get at least a 5 mph increase in speed with mine.
Conversely,
I
lose .5 gph to maintain the same speed.

But what is really neutral, as some people here have asked. My reflex (in
flight) might be the same as Ken's neutral. The only true measurement is
relative to the wing, not the cabin roof. In my case, the fairings boxes
actually droop down a bit towards my flaperons in neutral, so that could
explain somewhat my extra speed in reflex.

Walter

-----Original Message-----
From: mike.davis@dcsol.com [mailto:mike.davis@dcsol.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Sent: January 31, 2009 5:20 AM
To: rebel-builders@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: [rebel-builders] Ailerons-neutral position

With one notch of reflex my flaperons sag enough to actually sit neutral
when parked but can't say I've ever noticed any aesthetics from this on
any Rebel. I never use two notches of reflex probably due to a
combination of my low power cruise and the drooped STOL leading edge
cuff. At gross weight and much of the time I don't use any so there is
at least one Rebel (maybe only one) for which reflex is not really
relevant.

Suspect you are right about more drag clean up by fairing the wing root
than the wingtip. Some Cessna's have a nice fiberglass upswept fuselage
to flap fairing.

Ken

Walter Klatt wrote:
I built my Rebel a long time ago, but still remember that after flying
it,
I
wished I would have lined up my fairing box and wing tips with the
reflex
position since that is where the flaperons spend most of their time. My
assumption is that you would save a bit of drag in reflex cruise then.
Just
remember, though, that due to flexing, your inflight reflex position is
not
the same as on the ground, just as is the case with the flaperon
position.
If you want it to look good on the ground, you can leave them there,
too.
Walter

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------







-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


Locked