Do you want this big green box to go away? Well here's how...

Click here for full update

Wildcat! photo archives restored.

Click here for full update

Donors can now disable ads.

Click here for instructions

Add yourself to the user map.

Click here for instructions

Diesel engine option

Converted from Wildcat! database. (read only)
Roger Cole

Diesel engine option

Post by Roger Cole » Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:33 pm

Greg,
Jabiru had their 8-cylinder engine on display at Oshkosh in July/August and
they were taking orders at an introductory price of US$15,600. If I
remember correctly, delivery would start in January. The numbers on the
engine are very impressive, so it will be interesting to see what the user
experience is. Like you, I am not impressed with the 4-cylinder Lycomings.
I usually fly a Cessna 172P with a Lycoming O-320. Compared to my brother's
Cessna 172B with a 6-cylinder Continental O-300, the 172P is a flying
"Relaxerciser".

My feeling in regard to most auto conversions is that they need to be
derated some from their claimed power rating. One check that I use is to
calculate the brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) in psi. BMEP=150.8*T/V,
where T is the maximum torque rating in ft-lb and V is the volume
displacement in cubic inches. This formula applies to 4-stroke engines.
Most naturally-aspirated engines fall in the BMEP range of 140-150 psi, so
anything larger should be viewed with suspicion. Supercharged/turbocharged
engines will have a higher BMEP so the formula is not a good check on those
engines.

You can also work the formula in reverse to calculate a torque from a BEMP.
If I want to calculate the torque at maximum power, you should use the low
end of the BMEP range. So at maximum power a 2.5-liter (150 cu. in.) engine
would produce about 140 ft-lb of torque or maybe a little less. Another
formula gives the rpm of that condition: N=5252*P/T, where N is the rpm and
P is the horsepower. The 2.5-liter engine would be screaming at 6750 rpm to
produce 180 hp. Do you want to fly behind an engine that has to turn 6750
rpm to make its rated power? Perhaps I have ranted too much, but this is a
long-winded way of saying that the claimed power should be derated in
aircraft applications. By the way, the 2.5-liter engine in my car is rated
by the manufacturer at 170 hp @ 6250 rpm and it has a red line of 6750 rpm.
Check the numbers.

My feeling about the Subaru EJ-25 is that it shouldn't be pushed beyond
about 160 hp. However Subaru has a new 3.0-liter 6-cylinder engine that is
the same size and weight as the EJ-25. This is not the older 3.3-liter
6-cylinder engine. The 3.0-liter engine could probably make an honest 180
hp in an airplane. In a few years there may be enough of them to see a few
conversions.

It is good to hear that you are making good progress. I plan to keep a
close watch on the Jabiru engine developments. Best regards,
--
Roger Cole <rcole927@earthlink.net>
Elite 709


----------
From: Gregory Gordon <cosglo@ozemail.com.au>
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: Diesel engine option
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2002, 3:49 AM
Dear Roger,
Like you I am building my tail kit, although my progress is moving along
nicely. I also have been thinking about an appropiate engine for my Elite. I
am not too "fussed" about a Lycoming, due mainly to the overall initial cost
and then the ongoing cost of parts. A month ago I flew from my home
(Sydney, Aus.) to Bundaberg, the home of Jabiru to have a look at their 6
litre, Jabiru 6600 engine. I was impressed. At this point in time, the
engine is been trialled in a 3/4 scaled experimental Spitfire aircraft. This
aircraft moves along at 200kts plus; but it is very early days yet. I was
advised that the factory will be trying out the engine in an RV 6 soon. The
packaged price is very good; The engine complete with starter, muffler &
dual electronic ignition is Aus$23,000; they will have a complete fire wall
forward component kit for the Elite/Rebel for Aus$5000; this includes
cowling, engine mount, oil cooler, propellor(fixed pitch wooden), spinner &
miscellaneous items. But I say again that it is very early days!!!
I have also looked at two Subaru packages based upon either a EJ-22(160hp)
or the EJ-25(180hp) using a SUB4 PSRU. The SUB4 agent here in Australia has
a new engine package based upon the EJ-25 and the SUB4 PSRU for about
Aus$13,000. Both these engine can easily be turbo charged. So there are some
good alternatives to the Lycoming.


Kind regards,
Greg Gordon. Elite 724E







*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe go to http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/listserv.htm
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Gregory Gordon

Diesel engine option

Post by Gregory Gordon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:33 pm

Dear Roger,
Thanks for the advice; I will do the "numbers" on the Subaru engines; I am
leaning that way, as I may want to go down the turbo road; Australia is hot
in summer, hence density altitude is a big factor.
If you are ever in Australia, then a trip to see the Jabiru factory is
worthwhile, a very impressive factory, with some very dedicated people.

Kind regards,
Greg. Gordon.






-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

mike.davis

Diesel engine option

Post by mike.davis » Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:33 pm

Many of you know that I'm already sold on the Subaru engines... here are a
couple of thoughts that have swayed me to these engines.

A co-worker and tenant of mine bought a Subaru WRX this summer. The car has a
2.0-liter turbo factory rated at 235 HP. Having had the opportunity to drive
this car I was blown away by the smoothness and power. I discussed the fact
that in an airplane the engine would be run at much higher sustained RPM
settings than normally used in a car. To show me just how well the engine
would handle this, my friend drove us to work (26 miles each way) in second
gear at speeds averaging about 80 MPH... that worked out to a little over 7000
RPM! He did this 3 days in a row. I was amazed, other than being a little
louder, it was just like running down the road under 3000 RPM. He also showed
me numbers and reports from the World Rally racing organization, of which this
car is a top competitor, that showed this engine, after being hopped up of
course, producing 350 HP, and running an entire season without failure!
That's not in just one car either... this car is one of the top choices for
rally racing and there are dozens of examples on the racing ciruit. If you've
ever watched world class rally racing... they beat the hell out of those cars
and engines! Most of the other engines used needed to be rebuilt every couple
of races. Most of this can be attributed to the boxer design, that allows 7
main bearings in 12 inches. Also, when viewing the higher RPM, don't forget
that the RPM is not the important number, it's piston speed. Because of the
shorter stroke of these engines the Subaru's piston speed at 6500 RPM is only
about 7% higher than a Chevy 350 at 3800 RPM... and the piston mass is
considerably less. Finally, the proof in the pudding for me is the history
Subaru conversions are building every day in experimental aircraft. Just go
to Eggenfellner's web page some time and spend a couple of hours reading all
the customer testimonials!

Mike
195SR

On 11/3/02 9:35 PM, MURPHY-REBEL@DCSOL.COM wrote to MIKE DAVIS:

-> My feeling about the Subaru EJ-25 is that it shouldn't be pushed beyond
-> about 160 hp. However Subaru has a new 3.0-liter 6-cylinder engine that is
-> the same size and weight as the EJ-25. This is not the older 3.3-liter
-> 6-cylinder engine. The 3.0-liter engine could probably make an honest 180
-> hp in an airplane. In a few years there may be enough of them to see a few
-> conversions.




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

klehman

Diesel engine option

Post by klehman » Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:33 pm

I like to be conservative but the Subaru may justify a little slack in
the generalization. The ej20, ej22, ej25 engines are 4 valve, forged
crank, tight tolerance, 5 main bearing, extensively rally proven engines
that I believe run more than 100% volumetric efficiency stock (normal
aspiration but with some factory intake and exhaust tuning as is now
common). I agree with your basic premise as some of the claims by
Subaru engine converters seem crazy but I guess I'm still impressed by
the Subaru.

Ken

Roger Cole wrote:
Greg,
Jabiru had their 8-cylinder engine on display at Oshkosh in July/August and
they were taking orders at an introductory price of US$15,600. If I
remember correctly, delivery would start in January. The numbers on the
engine are very impressive, so it will be interesting to see what the user
experience is. Like you, I am not impressed with the 4-cylinder Lycomings.
I usually fly a Cessna 172P with a Lycoming O-320. Compared to my brother's
Cessna 172B with a 6-cylinder Continental O-300, the 172P is a flying
"Relaxerciser".

My feeling in regard to most auto conversions is that they need to be
derated some from their claimed power rating. One check that I use is to
calculate the brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) in psi. BMEP=150.8*T/V,
where T is the maximum torque rating in ft-lb and V is the volume
displacement in cubic inches. This formula applies to 4-stroke engines.
Most naturally-aspirated engines fall in the BMEP range of 140-150 psi, so
anything larger should be viewed with suspicion. Supercharged/turbocharged
engines will have a higher BMEP so the formula is not a good check on those
engines.

You can also work the formula in reverse to calculate a torque from a BEMP.
If I want to calculate the torque at maximum power, you should use the low
end of the BMEP range. So at maximum power a 2.5-liter (150 cu. in.) engine
would produce about 140 ft-lb of torque or maybe a little less. Another
formula gives the rpm of that condition: N=5252*P/T, where N is the rpm and
P is the horsepower. The 2.5-liter engine would be screaming at 6750 rpm to
produce 180 hp. Do you want to fly behind an engine that has to turn 6750
rpm to make its rated power? Perhaps I have ranted too much, but this is a
long-winded way of saying that the claimed power should be derated in
aircraft applications. By the way, the 2.5-liter engine in my car is rated
by the manufacturer at 170 hp @ 6250 rpm and it has a red line of 6750 rpm.
Check the numbers.

My feeling about the Subaru EJ-25 is that it shouldn't be pushed beyond
about 160 hp. However Subaru has a new 3.0-liter 6-cylinder engine that is
the same size and weight as the EJ-25. This is not the older 3.3-liter
6-cylinder engine. The 3.0-liter engine could probably make an honest 180
hp in an airplane. In a few years there may be enough of them to see a few
conversions.

It is good to hear that you are making good progress. I plan to keep a
close watch on the Jabiru engine developments. Best regards,
--
Roger Cole <rcole927@earthlink.net>
Elite 709




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Roger Cole

Diesel engine option

Post by Roger Cole » Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:33 pm

Ken,
I'm not saying that Subarus are bad. I have seen some that are apparently
very good installations. And I haven't rejected the idea of a Subaru for my
Elite, but I'll keep my options open as long as I can. I agree that intake
tuning can give a mild supercharging effect in a narrow rpm range. With
intake tuning, you might be able to achieve a BMEP as high as 160 psi.
--
Roger Cole <rcole927@earthlink.net>
Elite 709

----------
From: klehman <klehman@albedo.net>
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: Diesel engine option
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2002, 9:38 AM
I like to be conservative but the Subaru may justify a little slack in
the generalization. The ej20, ej22, ej25 engines are 4 valve, forged
crank, tight tolerance, 5 main bearing, extensively rally proven engines
that I believe run more than 100% volumetric efficiency stock (normal
aspiration but with some factory intake and exhaust tuning as is now
common). I agree with your basic premise as some of the claims by
Subaru engine converters seem crazy but I guess I'm still impressed by
the Subaru.

Ken

Roger Cole wrote:
Greg,
Jabiru had their 8-cylinder engine on display at Oshkosh in July/August and
they were taking orders at an introductory price of US$15,600. If I
remember correctly, delivery would start in January. The numbers on the
engine are very impressive, so it will be interesting to see what the user
experience is. Like you, I am not impressed with the 4-cylinder Lycomings.
I usually fly a Cessna 172P with a Lycoming O-320. Compared to my brother's
Cessna 172B with a 6-cylinder Continental O-300, the 172P is a flying
"Relaxerciser".

My feeling in regard to most auto conversions is that they need to be
derated some from their claimed power rating. One check that I use is to
calculate the brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) in psi. BMEP=150.8*T/V,
where T is the maximum torque rating in ft-lb and V is the volume
displacement in cubic inches. This formula applies to 4-stroke engines.
Most naturally-aspirated engines fall in the BMEP range of 140-150 psi, so
anything larger should be viewed with suspicion. Supercharged/turbocharged
engines will have a higher BMEP so the formula is not a good check on those
engines.

You can also work the formula in reverse to calculate a torque from a BEMP.
If I want to calculate the torque at maximum power, you should use the low
end of the BMEP range. So at maximum power a 2.5-liter (150 cu. in.) engine
would produce about 140 ft-lb of torque or maybe a little less. Another
formula gives the rpm of that condition: N=5252*P/T, where N is the rpm and
P is the horsepower. The 2.5-liter engine would be screaming at 6750 rpm to
produce 180 hp. Do you want to fly behind an engine that has to turn 6750
rpm to make its rated power? Perhaps I have ranted too much, but this is a
long-winded way of saying that the claimed power should be derated in
aircraft applications. By the way, the 2.5-liter engine in my car is rated
by the manufacturer at 170 hp @ 6250 rpm and it has a red line of 6750 rpm.
Check the numbers.

My feeling about the Subaru EJ-25 is that it shouldn't be pushed beyond
about 160 hp. However Subaru has a new 3.0-liter 6-cylinder engine that is
the same size and weight as the EJ-25. This is not the older 3.3-liter
6-cylinder engine. The 3.0-liter engine could probably make an honest 180
hp in an airplane. In a few years there may be enough of them to see a few
conversions.

It is good to hear that you are making good progress. I plan to keep a
close watch on the Jabiru engine developments. Best regards,
--
Roger Cole <rcole927@earthlink.net>
Elite 709


*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe go to http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/listserv.htm
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*

-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


Falcon

Diesel engine option

Post by Falcon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:33 pm

Mike,
Nice plug for the Subaru. I agree with your observations after reading a few
articles on the rally racers. If I had an Elite (I have the standard rebel) there
would be no question about putting an Eggenfeller Suberu on it. His package is one
of the cleanest designs out there. I have known Jan personally for about 8 years
and have watched him struggle through the difficult process of developing his
package. He is totally committed to his design. Anything less than his total
commitment and enthusiasm would have ended his efforts long ago.
Good luck with your SR, you'll need it
Rick D.

mike.davis@dcsol.com wrote:
Many of you know that I'm already sold on the Subaru engines... here are a
couple of thoughts that have swayed me to these engines.

A co-worker and tenant of mine bought a Subaru WRX this summer. The car has a
2.0-liter turbo factory rated at 235 HP. Having had the opportunity to drive
this car I was blown away by the smoothness and power. I discussed the fact
that in an airplane the engine would be run at much higher sustained RPM
settings than normally used in a car. To show me just how well the engine
would handle this, my friend drove us to work (26 miles each way) in second
gear at speeds averaging about 80 MPH... that worked out to a little over 7000
RPM! He did this 3 days in a row. I was amazed, other than being a little
louder, it was just like running down the road under 3000 RPM. He also showed
me numbers and reports from the World Rally racing organization, of which this
car is a top competitor, that showed this engine, after being hopped up of
course, producing 350 HP, and running an entire season without failure!
That's not in just one car either... this car is one of the top choices for
rally racing and there are dozens of examples on the racing ciruit. If you've
ever watched world class rally racing... they beat the hell out of those cars
and engines! Most of the other engines used needed to be rebuilt every couple
of races. Most of this can be attributed to the boxer design, that allows 7
main bearings in 12 inches. Also, when viewing the higher RPM, don't forget
that the RPM is not the important number, it's piston speed. Because of the
shorter stroke of these engines the Subaru's piston speed at 6500 RPM is only
about 7% higher than a Chevy 350 at 3800 RPM... and the piston mass is
considerably less. Finally, the proof in the pudding for me is the history
Subaru conversions are building every day in experimental aircraft. Just go
to Eggenfellner's web page some time and spend a couple of hours reading all
the customer testimonials!

Mike
195SR

On 11/3/02 9:35 PM, MURPHY-REBEL@DCSOL.COM wrote to MIKE DAVIS:

-> My feeling about the Subaru EJ-25 is that it shouldn't be pushed beyond
-> about 160 hp. However Subaru has a new 3.0-liter 6-cylinder engine that is
-> the same size and weight as the EJ-25. This is not the older 3.3-liter
-> 6-cylinder engine. The 3.0-liter engine could probably make an honest 180
-> hp in an airplane. In a few years there may be enough of them to see a few
-> conversions.


*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe go to http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/listserv.htm
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Bob Patterson

Diesel engine option

Post by Bob Patterson » Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:33 pm

Hi Rick !

Shouldn't be any problem with Eggenfelner's Subaru on a
regular Rebel - there's at least on already going onto a Rebel
just down the road. Several builders have been flying Legacy
conversions for years in Rebels - one on amphibs in Newfoundland
for about 6 years !
......bobp

--------------------------------orig.--------------------------------------
At 04:32 PM 11/5/02 -0800, you wrote:
Mike,
Nice plug for the Subaru. I agree with your observations after reading
a few
articles on the rally racers. If I had an Elite (I have the standard rebel)
there
would be no question about putting an Eggenfeller Suberu on it. His package
is one
of the cleanest designs out there. I have known Jan personally for about 8
years
and have watched him struggle through the difficult process of developing his
package. He is totally committed to his design. Anything less than his total
commitment and enthusiasm would have ended his efforts long ago.
Good luck with your SR, you'll need it
Rick D.

mike.davis@dcsol.com wrote:
Many of you know that I'm already sold on the Subaru engines... here are a
couple of thoughts that have swayed me to these engines.

A co-worker and tenant of mine bought a Subaru WRX this summer. The car
has a
2.0-liter turbo factory rated at 235 HP. Having had the opportunity to drive
this car I was blown away by the smoothness and power. I discussed the fact
that in an airplane the engine would be run at much higher sustained RPM
settings than normally used in a car. To show me just how well the engine
would handle this, my friend drove us to work (26 miles each way) in second
gear at speeds averaging about 80 MPH... that worked out to a little over
7000
RPM! He did this 3 days in a row. I was amazed, other than being a little
louder, it was just like running down the road under 3000 RPM. He also
showed
me numbers and reports from the World Rally racing organization, of which
this
car is a top competitor, that showed this engine, after being hopped up of
course, producing 350 HP, and running an entire season without failure!
That's not in just one car either... this car is one of the top choices for
rally racing and there are dozens of examples on the racing ciruit. If
you've
ever watched world class rally racing... they beat the hell out of those cars
and engines! Most of the other engines used needed to be rebuilt every
couple
of races. Most of this can be attributed to the boxer design, that allows 7
main bearings in 12 inches. Also, when viewing the higher RPM, don't forget
that the RPM is not the important number, it's piston speed. Because of the
shorter stroke of these engines the Subaru's piston speed at 6500 RPM is only
about 7% higher than a Chevy 350 at 3800 RPM... and the piston mass is
considerably less. Finally, the proof in the pudding for me is the history
Subaru conversions are building every day in experimental aircraft. Just go
to Eggenfellner's web page some time and spend a couple of hours reading all
the customer testimonials!

Mike
195SR

On 11/3/02 9:35 PM, MURPHY-REBEL@DCSOL.COM wrote to MIKE DAVIS:

-> My feeling about the Subaru EJ-25 is that it shouldn't be pushed beyond
-> about 160 hp. However Subaru has a new 3.0-liter 6-cylinder engine
that is
-> the same size and weight as the EJ-25. This is not the older 3.3-liter
-> 6-cylinder engine. The 3.0-liter engine could probably make an honest 180
-> hp in an airplane. In a few years there may be enough of them to see
a few
-> conversions.


*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe go to http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/listserv.htm
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe go to http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/listserv.htm
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------


Locked