irishfield wrote:For those using them... what are your thoughts for and against.
E-Mag P model.. running a single + old mag? Running dual P mags? They don't suggest one only... as you don't want the old one and the auto timing curve Pmag firing at different times.
LSE and it's more complicated system to install. Single or dual?
If I find my left mag has internal issues vs timing I may have to move up to the modern world.
From what I've read so far.. I really like the "auto" timing set up on the P-Mag by simply bolting them on and blowing in the manifold tube.
What I had / would have a real hard time with was getting use to the fact you can't shut your master off before shut down. Something that threw me off for a while when I had John Garstang's Elite here installing his amphibs. I'd shut down like I normally do and the engine would die at the stroke of the master switch!
G'day Wayne / Guys !
Here's my three pesos worth ....
( BTW : I wrote a HUGE answer - on my eyefone ( as I WAS away from home - werking in Sydney) - but when I went to post it - I got a weird message back ..... and my long winded post -was GONE !?!?!? ....................... fortunately I saved the text in the phone and here’s my post – now that I’m home again)
----------------------
Re the LSE / P-Mag etc .....
"R1" had a SOOPED UP 0-235 in it .... shovelling out about 145HP (empirically tested against other engines swinging the same test propeller)
It had one LSE and one "normal magneto" .... ( also 10:1 pistons, ported & polished blueprinted, balanced, custom inlets & carby, custom exhaust etc etc etc)
The LSE was a fair pain to fit ( as I'm sure you are aware) .... but it did give a big fat spark - and we estimate somewhere around 14% increase in power output ...
( Jon Johanson - the Ozzy that has broken 51 world records in his highly modified RV4) is a good friend -and the Australian agent for LSE ...... has been dyno testing LOTS of engines ..... and he said to me :
"The promotional stuff says that one LSE gives a 10% increase in power – and the second – 5% more ...... but our testing has proved that the FIRST electronic ignition adds 14% more HP .... and the second adds ONE percent more"
Our sooped up 0-235 delaminated the centre main at 208 hrs running time ... ( at 5,000ft - over cattle grazing land) .... we limped into a field 38 miles away ... ( NOTE : the bearing that failed was one of the aluminium based babbitt metal ones that Lycoming tried - with disastrous results - now abandoned - thank
)
Repaired / Rebuilt the 0-235 & sold it - detuned to its "normal" 125 HP “J” variant & bought an almost time-ex IO-320 (there REALLY is NO substitute for cubic inches guys !)
Sooped up the IO-320 .... ( custom tuned exhaust, put an IO-360 sump on it as 360’s have “tuned inlets” whereas the 320 doesn’t – which required some “massaging” of the inlet pipes – but it all worked out OK) ..... Still using the LSE - and replaced the standard magneto with an early P-Mag - ( engine is now making an estimated 180HP) and R1 was running HOT ! ( fast & GREAT short field performance)
Flying up the coast and HEAVY AS HELL - ( full fuel-61 US gallons, lots of tools & parts for our new house project) & BAM -the engine starts running like a hairy goat !!! .... (it was only firing on 3 cylinders as it turned out) ...
BEST I can get out of it is a 400fpm decent rate .... and I scraped it into an airstrip 7 miles inland
( discovered that the early E-mags were prone to spinning the timing magnet .... which mine obviously did ...
with the top plugs now not firing – and the "well worn" IO-320 is using a bit of oil - and the LSE WON'T fire "wet plugs" (Klaus confirmed this when I rang him to research the unit only firing on 3 cylinders after the E-mag spat the dummy) ...
A quick phone call and Brad at E-Mag has a NEW design P-Mag in my hands in 4 days flat ! ( that's Texas to outback Australia in 4 days)
The P-Mag is a breeze to fit & time ..... and I'm off in no time flat
History :
With the original setup (LSE and Magneto) ..... when I did a mag drop – and turned the LSE off, the magneto would let the RPM drop off about 150 ..... and when I dropped the magneto - the LSE didn't q...u...i...t...e hold the RPM – but it was better than the magneto ( due to the better “flame front propagation” from the bigger fatter spark
When the early version of the P-Mag was fitted in place of the magneto – the P-Mag HELD the RPM when I dropped the LSE – but with the LSE already dead/ dropped – the RPM hesitated noticeably when I did a mains bus drop ( as it switched over to it’s own internal alternator to supply power to run itself) ..... so you KNEW “something had happened” ......
BUT - with the NEW design P-Mag (with the timing magnet “pinned” in place – so it CAN’T move) fitted – it not only HOLDS the RPM when the LSE was dropped off – but when I then cut the mains supply – (thereby forcing the P-Mag to switch to it’s own internal power supply) – there was absolutely NO hesitation – whatsoever !
This meant that if you weren’t paying attention – and your 12Volt mains supply shat itself – you would NOT know about it – unless something else indicated the loss somehow !!!
I fitted a BIG red light on the dash - to say "HEY STUPID - YER 12 VOLT SYSTEM JUST WENT KAPUT!!!
I know the P-Mags aren't "cheap" .................. but I think they are well worth the extra dollars !
The engine produces MORE HP with a SIMPLE two bolt job !
They are DEAD EASY to fit and time PROPERLY
Runs more economically ( as you need less throttle for the same output - due to the better fuel burn I expect)
Idles smoother
Idles slower - IF you want that feature too !
I now have TWO NEW P-Mags waiting to go into R2 when she's ready to fly !
Hope this helps some of you guys in your decision making !