[rebel-builders] Cessna not having much luck with their new LSA 162
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:21 pm
I said right from the start that the tail was too small ....
You're right ! A Rebel would be a much better choice !! ;-)
--
......bobp
bobp@prosumers.ca
http://www.prosumers.ca/Ramble09
http://bpatterson.qhealthbeauty.com
http://apatterson2.qhealthzone.com
http://apatterson2.ordermygift.com
-------------------------------orig.-------------------------
On Friday 20 March 2009 02:10, Walter Klatt wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You're right ! A Rebel would be a much better choice !! ;-)
--
......bobp
bobp@prosumers.ca
http://www.prosumers.ca/Ramble09
http://bpatterson.qhealthbeauty.com
http://apatterson2.qhealthzone.com
http://apatterson2.ordermygift.com
-------------------------------orig.-------------------------
On Friday 20 March 2009 02:10, Walter Klatt wrote:
http://www.kansas.com/news/breaking/story/740273.html
Can't understand why everyone was so hot on this one to start with, as it
does not have much useful load. A Rebel SP is a lot more practical.
Walter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------