----- Original Message -----
From: Gozzi
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 1:43 PM
Subject: Tailwheel Anchor
Rebel Builders Friends
Happy New Year to you all!
I have a question on the tailwhell anchor assembling.
I understand from the manual that FUS 49 (tailspring bulkhead) should
be installed in parallel (4 3/4" distance) to the fin's rear U channel.
Next step is to attach FUS 85 and FUS 87 to FUS 49, guaranteeing a
snug fit between FUS 87 to the Tail Wrap (FUS 30). With this
configuration the botton part of FUS 87 will NOT be flat to FUS 30 and
therefore later on when attaching the 3/8" tailwhell spring attaching
bolt will not NOT be square to FUS 30.
Murphy suggests to sand FUS 87 untill the contacting surfaces have a
snug fit but there is NOT sufficient material in FUS 87 to form the
required angle. The manual shows FUS 87 with a much thicker botton
(figure 12.6.4) which, of course, would permit a to sand to the
required angle.
Am I missing something here? I am thinking in making an additional
packer to permit the correct fit but would very much appreciate to have
your views before any change to the manual.
Many thanks for your usual help
Jose/Rebel 700
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want this big green box to go away? Well here's how...
Click here for full update
Wildcat! photo archives restored.
Click here for full update
Donors can now disable ads.
Click here for instructions
Add yourself to the user map.
Click here for instructions
Click here for full update
Wildcat! photo archives restored.
Click here for full update
Donors can now disable ads.
Click here for instructions
Add yourself to the user map.
Click here for instructions
Tailwheel Anchor
-
rognal
Tailwheel Anchor
Jose,
I had a similiar problem. After conferring with Murphy Tech (Brian), I
fashioned a spacer(packer)to fill the gap. At the time I bolted that assembly
together I coated it with Pro-Seal, and used a slightly longer bolt.
Hope this helps,
Roger Hoffman #687R
Eugene, OR USA!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I had a similiar problem. After conferring with Murphy Tech (Brian), I
fashioned a spacer(packer)to fill the gap. At the time I bolted that assembly
together I coated it with Pro-Seal, and used a slightly longer bolt.
Hope this helps,
Roger Hoffman #687R
Eugene, OR USA!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Gozzi
Tailwheel Anchor
Eugene
Many thanks
Your comment does help!
Regards
Jose/R700
----- Original Message -----
From: <rognal@dcsol.com>
To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Tailwheel Anchor
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Many thanks
Your comment does help!
Regards
Jose/R700
----- Original Message -----
From: <rognal@dcsol.com>
To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Tailwheel Anchor
assemblyJose,
I had a similiar problem. After conferring with Murphy Tech (Brian), I
fashioned a spacer(packer)to fill the gap. At the time I bolted that
together I coated it with Pro-Seal, and used a slightly longer bolt.
Hope this helps,
Roger Hoffman #687R
Eugene, OR USA!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://www.dcsol.com/login?mode=HTML
username "rebel" password "builder"
Subscription services located at:
https://www.dcsol.com/public/code/html-subscribe.htm
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
brad
Tailwheel Anchor
Jose,
It sounds like I wasn't the only one with this problem.
I ended up just using a spacer (packer) between the Fus 87 & 30. Not sure if
this is correct but it seems to have worked.
Brad (R195)
On 1/2/2005 6:48 AM, JOSE.L.GOZZI@UOL.COM.BR wrote to REBEL-BUILDERS:
-> Received: by dcsol.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.0.451.3)
-> for rebel-builders@dcsol.com; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:44:02 -0900
-> Received: from smtpout6.uol.com.br ([200.221.4.197]) EHLO=smtp.uol.com.br
-> by dcsol.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.0.451.3) with SMTP
-> id 201634593; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:44:00 -0900
-> Received: from ig (200-98-58-237.tlf.dialuol.com.br [200.98.58.237])
-> by scorpion6.uol.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DF257A31
-> for <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:43:55 -0200 (BRST)
-> Message-ID: <001901c4f0e2$82969bc0$ed3a62c8@ig>
-> From: "Gozzi" <jose.l.gozzi@uol.com.br>
-> To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
-> Subject: Re: Tailwheel Anchor
-> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:48:30 -0200
-> X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
-> X-Orig-Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----
=_NextPart_000_0016_01C4F0D1.BE4D8900"
-> X-Priority: 3
-> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
-> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
-> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
-> X-Antivirus-Remover: Message filtered with wsAV v2.0.0 Build 001
->
->
-> ----- Original Message -----
-> From: Gozzi
-> To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com
-> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 1:43 PM
-> Subject: Tailwheel Anchor
->
->
-> Rebel Builders Friends
->
-> Happy New Year to you all!
->
-> I have a question on the tailwhell anchor assembling.
->
-> I understand from the manual that FUS 49 (tailspring bulkhead) should
-> be installed in parallel (4 3/4" distance) to the fin's rear U channel.
->
-> Next step is to attach FUS 85 and FUS 87 to FUS 49, guaranteeing a
-> snug fit between FUS 87 to the Tail Wrap (FUS 30). With this
-> configuration the botton part of FUS 87 will NOT be flat to FUS 30 and
-> therefore later on when attaching the 3/8" tailwhell spring attaching
-> bolt will not NOT be square to FUS 30.
->
-> Murphy suggests to sand FUS 87 untill the contacting surfaces have a
-> snug fit but there is NOT sufficient material in FUS 87 to form the
-> required angle. The manual shows FUS 87 with a much thicker botton
-> (figure 12.6.4) which, of course, would permit a to sand to the
-> required angle.
->
-> Am I missing something here? I am thinking in making an additional
-> packer to permit the correct fit but would very much appreciate to have
-> your views before any change to the manual.
->
-> Many thanks for your usual help
->
-> Jose/Rebel 700
->
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
It sounds like I wasn't the only one with this problem.
I ended up just using a spacer (packer) between the Fus 87 & 30. Not sure if
this is correct but it seems to have worked.
Brad (R195)
On 1/2/2005 6:48 AM, JOSE.L.GOZZI@UOL.COM.BR wrote to REBEL-BUILDERS:
-> Received: by dcsol.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.0.451.3)
-> for rebel-builders@dcsol.com; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:44:02 -0900
-> Received: from smtpout6.uol.com.br ([200.221.4.197]) EHLO=smtp.uol.com.br
-> by dcsol.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.0.451.3) with SMTP
-> id 201634593; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:44:00 -0900
-> Received: from ig (200-98-58-237.tlf.dialuol.com.br [200.98.58.237])
-> by scorpion6.uol.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DF257A31
-> for <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:43:55 -0200 (BRST)
-> Message-ID: <001901c4f0e2$82969bc0$ed3a62c8@ig>
-> From: "Gozzi" <jose.l.gozzi@uol.com.br>
-> To: <rebel-builders@dcsol.com>
-> Subject: Re: Tailwheel Anchor
-> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:48:30 -0200
-> X-Orig-MIME-Version: 1.0
-> X-Orig-Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----
=_NextPart_000_0016_01C4F0D1.BE4D8900"
-> X-Priority: 3
-> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
-> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
-> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
-> X-Antivirus-Remover: Message filtered with wsAV v2.0.0 Build 001
->
->
-> ----- Original Message -----
-> From: Gozzi
-> To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com
-> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 1:43 PM
-> Subject: Tailwheel Anchor
->
->
-> Rebel Builders Friends
->
-> Happy New Year to you all!
->
-> I have a question on the tailwhell anchor assembling.
->
-> I understand from the manual that FUS 49 (tailspring bulkhead) should
-> be installed in parallel (4 3/4" distance) to the fin's rear U channel.
->
-> Next step is to attach FUS 85 and FUS 87 to FUS 49, guaranteeing a
-> snug fit between FUS 87 to the Tail Wrap (FUS 30). With this
-> configuration the botton part of FUS 87 will NOT be flat to FUS 30 and
-> therefore later on when attaching the 3/8" tailwhell spring attaching
-> bolt will not NOT be square to FUS 30.
->
-> Murphy suggests to sand FUS 87 untill the contacting surfaces have a
-> snug fit but there is NOT sufficient material in FUS 87 to form the
-> required angle. The manual shows FUS 87 with a much thicker botton
-> (figure 12.6.4) which, of course, would permit a to sand to the
-> required angle.
->
-> Am I missing something here? I am thinking in making an additional
-> packer to permit the correct fit but would very much appreciate to have
-> your views before any change to the manual.
->
-> Many thanks for your usual help
->
-> Jose/Rebel 700
->
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
