How to meaure the height of a tall building!!!!
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:15 pm
Thought this had some relevance here..........more than one right answer and
way to do just about everything (including building an airplane!!)
............................................................................
..............................................
Sir Ernest Rutherford, President of the Royal Academy, and recipient of the
Nobel Prize in Physics, related the following story:
"Some time ago I received a call from a colleague. He was about to give a
student a zero for his answer to a physics question, while the student
claimed a perfect score. The instructor and the student agreed to an
impartial arbiter, and I was selected.
I read the examination question: "Show how it is possible to determine
the height of a tall building with the aid of a barometer."
The student had answered: "Take the barometer to the top of the building,
attach a long rope to it, lower it to the street, and then bring it up,
measuring the length of the rope. The length of the rope is the height of
the building."
The student really had a strong case for full credit since he had really
answered the question completely and correctly! On the other hand, if
full credit were given, it could well contribute to a high grade in his
physics course and certify competence in physics, but the answer did not
confirm
this. I suggested that the student have another try. I gave the student
six minutes to answer the question with the warning that the answer should
show some knowledge of physics.
At the end of five minutes, he hadn't written anything. I asked if he
wished to give up, but he said he had many answers to this problem; he
was just thinking of the best one. I excused myself for interrupting him and
asked him to please go on. In the next minute, he dashed off his answer,
which read: "Take the barometer to the top of the building and lean over
the edge of the roof. Drop the barometer, timing its fall with a
stopwatch. Then, using the formula x=0.5*a*t^2, calculate the height of the
building."
At this point, I asked my colleague if he would give up. He conceded, and
gave the student almost full credit. While leaving my colleague's office,
I recalled that the student had said that he had other answers to the
problem, so I asked him what they were.
"Well," said the student, "there are many ways of getting the height of a
tall building with the aid of a barometer. For example, you could take
the barometer out on a sunny day and measure the height of the barometer,
the
length of its shadow, and the length of the shadow of the building, and
by the use of simple proportion, determine the height of the building."
"Fine," I said, "and others?"
"Yes," said the student, "there is a very basic measurement method you
will like. In this method, you take the barometer and begin to walk up the
stairs. As you climb the stairs, you mark off the length of the barometer
along the wall. You then count the number of marks, and his will give you
the height of the building in barometer units."
"A very direct method."
"Of course. If you want a more sophisticated method, you can tie the
barometer to the end of a string, swing it as a pendulum, and determine
the value of g [gravity] at the street level and at the top of the building.
"On this same tack, you could take the barometer to the top of the
building, attach a long rope to it, lower it to just above the street,
and then swing it as a pendulum. You could then calculate the height of the
building by the period of the precession".
"Finally," he concluded, "there are many other ways of solving the
problem."
"Probably the best," he said, "is to take the barometer to the basement
and knock on the superintendent's door. When the superintendent answers, you
speak to him as follows: 'Mr. Superintendent, here is a fine barometer.
If you will tell me the height of the building, I will give you this
barometer."
At this point, I asked the student if he really did not know the
conventional answer to this question. He admitted that he did, but said
that he was fed up with high school and college instructors trying to
teach him how to think.
The name of the student was Neils Bohr.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe from this list go to:
http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/code/html-subscribe.wcx
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
way to do just about everything (including building an airplane!!)
............................................................................
..............................................
Sir Ernest Rutherford, President of the Royal Academy, and recipient of the
Nobel Prize in Physics, related the following story:
"Some time ago I received a call from a colleague. He was about to give a
student a zero for his answer to a physics question, while the student
claimed a perfect score. The instructor and the student agreed to an
impartial arbiter, and I was selected.
I read the examination question: "Show how it is possible to determine
the height of a tall building with the aid of a barometer."
The student had answered: "Take the barometer to the top of the building,
attach a long rope to it, lower it to the street, and then bring it up,
measuring the length of the rope. The length of the rope is the height of
the building."
The student really had a strong case for full credit since he had really
answered the question completely and correctly! On the other hand, if
full credit were given, it could well contribute to a high grade in his
physics course and certify competence in physics, but the answer did not
confirm
this. I suggested that the student have another try. I gave the student
six minutes to answer the question with the warning that the answer should
show some knowledge of physics.
At the end of five minutes, he hadn't written anything. I asked if he
wished to give up, but he said he had many answers to this problem; he
was just thinking of the best one. I excused myself for interrupting him and
asked him to please go on. In the next minute, he dashed off his answer,
which read: "Take the barometer to the top of the building and lean over
the edge of the roof. Drop the barometer, timing its fall with a
stopwatch. Then, using the formula x=0.5*a*t^2, calculate the height of the
building."
At this point, I asked my colleague if he would give up. He conceded, and
gave the student almost full credit. While leaving my colleague's office,
I recalled that the student had said that he had other answers to the
problem, so I asked him what they were.
"Well," said the student, "there are many ways of getting the height of a
tall building with the aid of a barometer. For example, you could take
the barometer out on a sunny day and measure the height of the barometer,
the
length of its shadow, and the length of the shadow of the building, and
by the use of simple proportion, determine the height of the building."
"Fine," I said, "and others?"
"Yes," said the student, "there is a very basic measurement method you
will like. In this method, you take the barometer and begin to walk up the
stairs. As you climb the stairs, you mark off the length of the barometer
along the wall. You then count the number of marks, and his will give you
the height of the building in barometer units."
"A very direct method."
"Of course. If you want a more sophisticated method, you can tie the
barometer to the end of a string, swing it as a pendulum, and determine
the value of g [gravity] at the street level and at the top of the building.
building, in principle, can be calculated."From the difference between the two values of g, the height of the
"On this same tack, you could take the barometer to the top of the
building, attach a long rope to it, lower it to just above the street,
and then swing it as a pendulum. You could then calculate the height of the
building by the period of the precession".
"Finally," he concluded, "there are many other ways of solving the
problem."
"Probably the best," he said, "is to take the barometer to the basement
and knock on the superintendent's door. When the superintendent answers, you
speak to him as follows: 'Mr. Superintendent, here is a fine barometer.
If you will tell me the height of the building, I will give you this
barometer."
At this point, I asked the student if he really did not know the
conventional answer to this question. He admitted that he did, but said
that he was fed up with high school and college instructors trying to
teach him how to think.
The name of the student was Neils Bohr.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe from this list go to:
http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/code/html-subscribe.wcx
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------