stainless Exhaust
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:08 pm
FWIW (and it may be very litlle) I have not been able to verify actual
poor experiences with 304 stainless. Yes 321 is superior at high
temperatures and preferred. However near as I can tell 304 headers stand
up very well in normally aspirated auto racing (even when wrapped) where
it seems to be considered superior to oem 409 stainless and mild steel.
At high power, aircraft header temperatures can apparently reach the
temperature necessary for carbide formation in 304 and resultant
cracking, but at what rate and is it significant? 321 can also crack
quickly if expansion and vibration are not allowed for or if argon
purging is not used during welding. Anyway I went with 304 on my Subaru.
If nothing else I've learned a bit about working with stainless while
using the much cheaper material. Proponents of using mild steel for the
first part of the headers because "stainless will crack" don't seem to
differentiate between 321 and 304 and don't seem to recite actual
experiences so I decided to try the experiment... ;)
Ken
RJBWoodman@aol.com wrote:
snip
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe from this list go to:
http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/code/html-subscribe.wcx
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
poor experiences with 304 stainless. Yes 321 is superior at high
temperatures and preferred. However near as I can tell 304 headers stand
up very well in normally aspirated auto racing (even when wrapped) where
it seems to be considered superior to oem 409 stainless and mild steel.
At high power, aircraft header temperatures can apparently reach the
temperature necessary for carbide formation in 304 and resultant
cracking, but at what rate and is it significant? 321 can also crack
quickly if expansion and vibration are not allowed for or if argon
purging is not used during welding. Anyway I went with 304 on my Subaru.
If nothing else I've learned a bit about working with stainless while
using the much cheaper material. Proponents of using mild steel for the
first part of the headers because "stainless will crack" don't seem to
differentiate between 321 and 304 and don't seem to recite actual
experiences so I decided to try the experiment... ;)
Ken
RJBWoodman@aol.com wrote:
snip
Snipbuilt from .035 304 stainless that i
have been told won't hold up for very long, heat will deteriorate it fast
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
To unsubscribe from this list go to:
http://www.dcsol.com:81/public/code/html-subscribe.wcx
Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm
To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------