Page 1 of 1

welded alum tank mod

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:37 pm
by Peter Cowan/Lexy Cameron
A Rebel near me (that may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two per wing panel that mount from the bottom. One is outboard of the strut. The two stringers are cut out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel that is machine screwed to nut plates.

Does anyone know for sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier skin with bolts is structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the original? There is some debate on this here.
Peter.

welded alum tank mod

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:37 pm
by Wayne G. O'Shea
Peter, I think I know the Rebel you are talking about. White in colour and was used/or to be used for aerial photography in the Caribbean. Haven't seen it since 1995, when it was at the Arthur gliding club for the start of one of Bob's Rambles. Had the extra fuel, etc for that and camera holes in the wing tips. Anyhow, DO NOT COPY THE INSTALLATION as I sure wouldn't want to pull any negative G's (or positive ones for that mater) in this aircraft!

There's doing "mods", and then there is stupidity!

Best Regards,
Wayne G. O'Shea
www.irishfield.on.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Cowan/Lexy Cameron (cowcam@pipcom.com)
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com (murphy-rebel@dcsol.com)
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: welded alum tank mod


A Rebel near me (that may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two per wing panel that mount from the bottom. One is outboard of the strut. The two stringers are cut out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel that is machine screwed to nut plates.

Does anyone know for sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier skin with bolts is structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the original? There is some debate on this here.
Peter.

welded alum tank mod

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:37 pm
by Bob Patterson
Hi Peter !

There should be no debate - DO NOT <EVER> CUT THE STRINGERS !!
Mr. Murphy has been emphatic on several occasions about there being
no acceptable replacement method for eliminating the stringers in
the Rebel wing.

They act as small wing spars, and you weaken the wing with
even a nick in a stringer. (There are acceptable methods
to splice them, if necessary, but even that would make me nervous !)

There was even a bulletin from the factory about NOT using
separate aluminum tanks (particularly from one outfit in BC !) -
I think it's still on their web site.

If that's the Rebel I'm thinking of, I'd be afraid to stand
under the wings, never mind fly it !! ;-)
(There's a reason it hasn't flown for a while !)

.....bobp

-----------------------------------orig.---------------------------------
At 12:02 PM 1/8/02 -0500, you wrote:
A Rebel near me (that may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two
per wing panel that mount from the bottom. One is outboard of the strut.
The two stringers are cut out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel that
is machine screwed to nut plates.
Does anyone know for sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier
skin with bolts is structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the
original? There is some debate on this here.
Peter.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-5" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=2>A Rebel near me (that
may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two per wing panel that mount
from the bottom. One is&nbsp; outboard of the strut. The two stringers are cut
out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel that is machine screwed to nut
plates.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=2>Does anyone know for
sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier skin with bolts is
structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the original? There is some
debate
on this here.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style"
size=2>Peter.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>


-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

welded alum tank mod

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:37 pm
by Dave Qualley
Here's a link to the bulletin from Murphy..

http://www.murphyair.com/Support/Bulletins/041196rb.htm

Dave
#057SR


Bob Patterson wrote:
There was even a bulletin from the factory about NOT using
separate aluminum tanks (particularly from one outfit in BC !) -
I think it's still on their web site.





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

welded alum tank mod

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:38 pm
by Peter Cowan/Lexy Cameron
I wish you and Wayne wouldn't be so wishy-washy with your opinions. It is
hard to know where you stand.

Thanks, guys. I get the message.
Peter.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Patterson <bob.patterson@canrem.com>
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com <murphy-rebel@dcsol.com>
Date: January 8, 2002 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: welded alum tank mod

Hi Peter !

There should be no debate - DO NOT <EVER> CUT THE STRINGERS !!
Mr. Murphy has been emphatic on several occasions about there being
no acceptable replacement method for eliminating the stringers in
the Rebel wing.

They act as small wing spars, and you weaken the wing with
even a nick in a stringer. (There are acceptable methods
to splice them, if necessary, but even that would make me nervous !)

There was even a bulletin from the factory about NOT using
separate aluminum tanks (particularly from one outfit in BC !) -
I think it's still on their web site.

If that's the Rebel I'm thinking of, I'd be afraid to stand
under the wings, never mind fly it !! ;-)
(There's a reason it hasn't flown for a while !)

.....bobp

-----------------------------------orig.---------------------------------
At 12:02 PM 1/8/02 -0500, you wrote:
A Rebel near me (that may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two
per wing panel that mount from the bottom. One is outboard of the strut.
The two stringers are cut out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel
that
is machine screwed to nut plates.
Does anyone know for sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier
skin with bolts is structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the
original? There is some debate on this here.
Peter.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-5" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=2>A Rebel near me
(that
may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two per wing panel that
mount
from the bottom. One is&nbsp; outboard of the strut. The two stringers are
cut
out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel that is machine screwed to
nut
plates.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style"
size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=2>Does anyone know
for
sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier skin with bolts is
structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the original? There is some
debate
on this here.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style"
size=2>Peter.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
** To unsubscribe, send e-mail to list-server@dcsol.com with **
** UNSUBSCRIBE MURPHY-REBEL in the message body on a line by itself **
** Archives located at http://rebel:builder@www.dcsol.com:81/default.htm **
** To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com **



-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

welded alum tank mod

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:38 pm
by Wayne G. O'Shea
We would rather be bold and seem rude, than to end up having one less
"friend" from the demise of flying a "time bomb"!!

Cheers,
Wayne

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Cowan/Lexy Cameron" <cowcam@pipcom.com>
To: <murphy-rebel@dcsol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: welded alum tank mod

I wish you and Wayne wouldn't be so wishy-washy with your opinions. It is
hard to know where you stand.

Thanks, guys. I get the message.
Peter.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Patterson <bob.patterson@canrem.com>
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com <murphy-rebel@dcsol.com>
Date: January 8, 2002 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: welded alum tank mod

Hi Peter !

There should be no debate - DO NOT <EVER> CUT THE STRINGERS !!
Mr. Murphy has been emphatic on several occasions about there being
no acceptable replacement method for eliminating the stringers in
the Rebel wing.

They act as small wing spars, and you weaken the wing with
even a nick in a stringer. (There are acceptable methods
to splice them, if necessary, but even that would make me nervous !)

There was even a bulletin from the factory about NOT using
separate aluminum tanks (particularly from one outfit in BC !) -
I think it's still on their web site.

If that's the Rebel I'm thinking of, I'd be afraid to stand
under the wings, never mind fly it !! ;-)
(There's a reason it hasn't flown for a while !)

.....bobp

-----------------------------------orig.---------------------------------
At 12:02 PM 1/8/02 -0500, you wrote:
A Rebel near me (that may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two
per wing panel that mount from the bottom. One is outboard of the strut.
The two stringers are cut out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel
that
is machine screwed to nut plates.
Does anyone know for sure if cutting the stringers and adding the
heavier
skin with bolts is structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the
original? There is some debate on this here.
Peter.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-5" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=2>A Rebel near me
(that
may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two per wing panel that
mount
from the bottom. One is&nbsp; outboard of the strut. The two stringers
are
cut
out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel that is machine screwed to
nut
plates.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style"
size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style" size=2>Does anyone
know
for
sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier skin with bolts is
structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the original? There is some
debate
on this here.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 face="Bookman Old Style"
size=2>Peter.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
** To unsubscribe, send e-mail to list-server@dcsol.com with
**
** UNSUBSCRIBE MURPHY-REBEL in the message body on a line by itself
**
**
** To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
**

** To unsubscribe, send e-mail to list-server@dcsol.com with
**
** UNSUBSCRIBE MURPHY-REBEL in the message body on a line by itself
**
**
** To contact the list admin, e-mail mike.davis@dcsol.com
**




-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

welded alum tank mod

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:38 pm
by Walter Klatt
Built in BC? Hmmm, I wonder if this is the one that was built at my home airport here in Langley, BC many years ago. It had a brand new 0235 engine in it, and I visited it many times during the construction as I was doing my own at the same time. It had the aluminium tanks, and may be the one that prompted that bulletin from MAM. There were a few other things I didn't like about it, and I learned what NOT to do when building mine. I think it had a big hole in the floor, too, for a camera. The builder, not the owner, was actually a professional AME, and he just thought he knew more than the factory about how this one should be built.
-----Original Message-----
From: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com [mailto:murphy-rebel@dcsol.com]On Behalf Of Wayne G. O'Shea
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:26 AM
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com
Subject: Re: welded alum tank mod


Peter, I think I know the Rebel you are talking about. White in colour and was used/or to be used for aerial photography in the Caribbean. Haven't seen it since 1995, when it was at the Arthur gliding club for the start of one of Bob's Rambles. Had the extra fuel, etc for that and camera holes in the wing tips. Anyhow, DO NOT COPY THE INSTALLATION as I sure wouldn't want to pull any negative G's (or positive ones for that mater) in this aircraft!

There's doing "mods", and then there is stupidity!

Best Regards,
Wayne G. O'Shea
www.irishfield.on.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Cowan/Lexy Cameron (cowcam@pipcom.com)
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com (murphy-rebel@dcsol.com)
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: welded alum tank mod


A Rebel near me (that may have been built in BC) has separate tanks, two per wing panel that mount from the bottom. One is outboard of the strut. The two stringers are cut out and the tank is held in with an 032 panel that is machine screwed to nut plates.

Does anyone know for sure if cutting the stringers and adding the heavier skin with bolts is structurally sound and roughly equivalent to the original? There is some debate on this here.
Peter.