fus 39/40 solution?

[Mike Davis]

Received: from MMoreho699@aol.com
by imo27.mx.aol.com (IMOv14_b1.1) id EZZJa06640
for <murphy-rebel@dcsol.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:54:30 +2000 (EDT)
From: <MMoreho699@aol.com>
Message-ID: <2563c630.35906a67@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 22:54:30 EDT
To: murphy-rebel@dcsol.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: fus 39/40 solution?
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="part0_898656870_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 for Mac sub 84

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--part0_898656870_boundary
Content-ID: <0_898656870@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Hello!

Check out my .jpg's to see how fus 39 (rear bottom cabin skin) and 40
(forward
bottom cabin skin) look to you. My side panels (fus 26) had the prepunched
vertical row of holes in them about halfway back and at the rear point of
the
bottom edge. (Mine seem to be missing an extra vertical row of holes
compared
to those in the manual)

I aligned the row of holes in the middle of fus 40 with those in the middle
of
the side panel. That made the rear holes of the side panels line up with the
rear holes of fus 40.

Since I am doing spring gear, I didn't use the fus 40 holes a few inches
infront of the rear holes and am leaving them open for now.

The bulkheads line up pretty well on fus 40. I overlap fus 39 ontop of fus
40
and get about 1.5" which allows for both of the doubled bulkheads to sit on
fus 40 and 39.

The only thing that doesn't match up are the intersections of the holes
along
the sides of fus 39 with those in fus 40 (running 90 degrees to these). Is
the
end hole or two in fus 39 supposed to align with a hole in the end row of
fus
40?

Thanks for your time,
Dan





-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------