I thought that would be how you should do it and it sounds like it makes sense but why
the camlocks rather than the large head DZUS fastener (their standard or supersonic
styles)? Is it a matter of $ or fit or other reasons? The DZUS come to mind since I was
looking to use them on something for my day job and they seem straight forward and less
complex than the camlock with built in spring etc.
Dave R.
Wayne G. O'Shea wrote:
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------*Dave and All,
Howard wanted Camlocks on his cowling (in place of the hinge) so what I did
was install (c/s rivet and filler) a .040 x 2 inch wide strip to the bottom
half of the cowling sides (and nose area sides), leaving about 1 inch
sticking up for the overlap of the top half of the cowling. The camlock
receptacles were installed on the "exposed" portion of the strip to mate up
with the camlocks that go through the top half of the fiberglass cowling. We
bought the retainer rings for the camlocks, but found that they cannot be
used at the nose (behind the spinner), or most of the way down the sides,
because the cowling will not spread enough to let the male camlock out of
the female receptacle. I guess some of them could be installed with the
retainer rings, but Howard was to install them after painting and I don't
know what he ever did with the rings. As it is now (because not all the
camlocks are the same length or colour) we have to take them out and stick
them into a piece of styrofoam in the order they are removed so they don't
get mixed up. Styrofoam is really good for this because if you stick the
camlocks into it good and deep, they <should> still be there after you have
borrowed a boat to go get your fasteners as they are floating down the lake
after being blown off the float deck!!!!!!
P.S. If you are going to use camlocks I suggest using phillips heads. Howard
bought slotted ones for his and it never fails that the screwdriver slips at
least once putting it on or off, to add another scratch to the paint job!
Blue skies,
Wayne G. O'Shea
www.irishfield.on.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Ricker" <ricker@dbis.ns.ca>
To: " (Murphy Rebel Builders List)" <murphy-rebel@dcsol.com>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: 0 320 engine mounts / cowling
differently asWayne, group
All this discussion on wires & cowlings has me curious about doing itoptions and whatWayne has referred to, presumably with 1/4 turn fasteners. What are thefor the "pointare the issues when using 1/4 turn fasteners (like reinforcing the cowlsort like theloading" of the fasteners etc).
Wayne, you mention camlocks, by the way you speak they are not the captiveyou are speakingDZUS I have seen in some applications, why not? I presume the camlocksaof are the spring loaded 1/4 turns built into a sort of barrel.
Dave R.
Wayne G. O'Shea wrote:
GEE, THANKS BRIAN! Is this beat up Wayne week or what?
Bob's P's cowling <CAN> be removed in less than 10 minutes unless he isBob'sreally slow screw'er. (although that <CAN> sometimes be a good thing!)tocowling is quicker to remove than Howard's (with his requested camlocksIkeep in order when removed on each side, instead of the piano wire) andwhilecan take Howard's off (top and bottom) in less than 10 minutes. I think
maybe Bob was just having one of those "bad days" and got carried awaycheckstyping his "tirade"!
The speed cowling is <DEFINITELY> not as easy to do quick maintenance(unlessthough, especially over the water, as no matter how you attach the cowl
there will be screws (or clips, or camlocks) to drop into the lakeinstead,as Bob says, you cut some large doors in the fiberglass cowl halvesgobesides the OPTIONAL oil access door I installed on his). The bottom,
firewall area, screws are the worst and the ones that are most likely tothe"plunk" in the lake! Howard slings a tarp between the floats to work atthatdock! Maybe that is why he didn't bother pulling his cowling to findinstallation.his carburetor was falling apart!!!!!! Personally, I will <NEVER, NEVER,
NEVER> install another Speed Cowling on a Rebel, unless specifically
requested by the customer, as I don't have any cheese left for any more
whine!
Regards,
Wayne G. O'Shea
www.irishfield.on.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "rebelair" <rebelair@idirect.com>
To: "Murphy Rebel Builders List" <murphy-rebel@dcsol.com>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: 0 320 engine mounts / cowling
either.IminutesastheThebutand,ondonethat withvisibilitypointchangethestandarditknowfitthethehasupset.aThe-----------------------------orig.---------------------------------------decide easeworth*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Murphy Rebel Builders List is for the discussion
between builders and owners of Murphy Rebel aircraft.
Archives located at:
http://www.dcsol.com/murphy-rebel/lists/default.htm
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
List archives located at: https://mail.dcsol.com/login
username "rebel" password "builder"
Unsubscribe: rebel-builders-unsubscribe@dcsol.com
List administrator: mike.davis@dcsol.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------